The Town of Chapel Hill is seeking input on traffic calming measures for a project along Fordham Boulevard.
The local government shared a new survey for the Fordham Boulevard Sidepath project, aiming to get feedback on several designs for pedestrian protection off the busy thoroughfare.
The project seeks to connect an existing bike path near Cleland Drive to Willow Drive by creating a new path parallel to Fordham Boulevard. By doing so, the path would need to cross over two streets: Ridgefield Road and Walnut Street. Town staff is seeking community members’ thoughts on two separate designs to help protect pedestrians using the path cross those sections. The proposed designs include raised pedestrian crossings and traffic diverters that prevent vehicles from turning right off Fordham.
Questions on the survey include whether you prefer a certain traffic calming feature or not, reasons why you visit the area and any additional features the town should consider.
Community members expressed concerns earlier this year about the construction of the sidepath, which would eliminate most trees and vegetation lining Fordham Boulevard and shielding properties from noise. During a Chapel Hill Town Council meeting when the project was advanced, one condition was a study of the types of trees in the area. With the release of the survey, the town also shared the study completed by an arborist that also includes suggests for what new species to plant along the stretch of road.
According to the town, input from the survey will be used in a public meeting this fall when considering recommendations for the traffic calming concepts and elements. It is taking input from the survey until August 21.
To fill out the survey about the Fordham Bouelvard Sidepath Project, or see the latest designs for the project, visit the Town of Chapel Hill’s website.
Photo via Town of Chapel Hill.
Chapelboro.com does not charge subscription fees. You can support local journalism and our mission to serve the community. Contribute today – every single dollar matters.
Related Stories
‹
Chapel Hill Moves Ahead with Fordham Boulevard Sidepath ProjectAfter hearing public comments and discussing among its members, the Chapel Hill Town Council approved an initial design for a new multi-use path along Fordham Boulevard. The town council approved the design option that will construct a sidepath between Fordham Boulevard and the properties of residents living on Hickory Drive. It’s an option members of […]
Chapel Hill Town Council Considers Options for Fordham Boulevard SidepathA project to build a sidepath to Fordham Boulevard in Chapel Hill has been in the works since 2016. While some residents have been outspoken against the development, the Town Council shared some of its own comments on Wednesday night. Representatives from Chapel Hill’s Transportation department presented two design options at the center of the […]
Chapel Hill Targets UNC Property on MLK Boulevard for Strategic Growth Pilot ProjectAs the Town of Chapel Hill assesses how to handle its need for housing with its limited supply, the local government recently turned to a group of leading urban planning consultants for advice. The result is a framework called the Complete Communities Strategy, with the goal of approving a pilot project to try the approach […]
Chapel Hill Considering Fordham Blvd. Greenway, Neighbors Advocate for Shared StreetTab Combs stands at the entrance of her neighborhood, Little Ridgefield. The Hickory Road resident points out how an existing path from Cleland Drive down the street would connect with a new side path proposed by the Town of Chapel Hill. “We’re about 20 feet from the outside edge of Fordham Boulevard, and we’re standing […]
Transit, Stormwater Among Concerns for Redevelopment of University Place in Chapel HillOwnership of the University Place mall continued to receive their first round of feedback on concept plans of a reimagining of the property. The Chapel Hill Town Council shared their impressions of the initial designs last week. The council’s review of the concept plans came just eight days after Ram Realty, the ownership group of […]
Chapel Hill Town Council Approves Application for Affordable Senior Housing Community at Homestead RoadThe Town of Chapel Hill recently approved a zoning application for a proposed senior housing community located along Homestead Road.
With Federal Funding Losses and Revaluation, Orange County's Governments Weigh Difficult Tax Rate and Budget ChoicesThe annual budgeting process is typically an exhaustive one for Orange County’s local governments and staff – but this year, it may be even more so
Chapel Hill Council Approves 300+ New Apartments, Retail Space on S. Elliott RoadThe Chapel Hill Town Council approved a conditional zoning request for 200 South Elliott Road, paving the way for a new apartment community.
Chapel Hill Shares Latest Pond Removal, Construction Timeline for Legion Road Housing and Park ProjectThe Town of Chapel Hill is beginning early stages to drain and remove both the pond and dam at its property off Legion Road.
Chapel Hill Signs Finalized DEQ Agreement for 828 MLK Boulevard Coal Ash SiteThe Chapel Hill Town Council recently finalized a decade-long effort for finding a solution to the coal ash at 828 MLK Jr. Boulevard.
›
Regarding the traffic calming concept plans, there is a significant error in the Concept 1.2 drawings that show the “Proposed Traffic Calming Island” as “RIGHT TURNS ONLY”. This is an obvious error, as it would only allow entry to the heart of the neighborhood on Walnut. The design should be redrawn and the survey re-released.
Regarding the arborist report, it appears as though someone requested a report with any possible justification to cut the buffer. Are there a few dead trees in the buffer? Yes. Otherwise it is a mature landscape that could easily be maintained by removing and replacing single trees as they die, and possibly converting the bamboo area to more easily maintained vegetation. One of the justifications to cut the buffer is that these are non-native species, but then the arborist goes on to suggest example replacements, with 2 out of 3 being non-native species. There are definitely native overstory and understory species in the buffer, and it’s not all in immediate danger of dying as you would be led to believe.
All that being said, if the sidepath is going through, it’s better to be honest about the extent of the trees that will die within 2-3 years of the project completion due to root compaction, severance and suffocation because of the extensive cut and fill profiles in the sidepath plans. But don’t tell us the whole buffer is diseased and non-native and that’s why it has to go.