It’s too late to restore a photo identification requirement to vote in North Carolina for the March primary, attorneys for the state and the NAACP wrote separately on Friday, opposing efforts by Republicans to suspend a judge’s order blocking the requirement.

The State Board of Elections — a defendant in a lawsuit challenging the 2018 voter ID law — is already appealing U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs’ order on Dec. 31 halting the use of photo ID for the time being. But the state Department of Justice, which represents the board, didn’t try to overturn her preliminary injunction before the March 3 primary because it said restoring voter ID now would cause confusion.

That prompted North Carolina Republican legislative leaders to file a motion Jan. 10 seeking to officially enter the lawsuit and ask the voter ID law to be enforced in the primary. Attorney General Josh Stein’s lawyers pointed out that House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger aren’t parties in the lawsuit. Biggs has twice rejected their requests to join the case.

The election is already underway, with more than 8,000 absentee ballots requested so far and hundreds of ballots already returned, Friday’s brief says. The voter ID law requires absentee ballot filers to comply with the photo ID mandate, too. Early in-person voting begins Feb. 13.

“The state board has taken a number of specific measures to comply with the court’s order, and it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, and confusing to the public, to unwind many of these actions in an orderly way if the order were stayed,” the state’s lawyers wrote.

The state NAACP and local NAACP chapters sued over the law in December 2018. Biggs ruled about a year later that the voter ID rules appeared to contain the racially discriminatory taint of several sections of a 2013 voting law that a federal appeals court declared unconstitutional in 2016. That 2013 law required photo ID but also scaled back early in-person voting. Republican legislators, who had approved both laws, disagree with Biggs.

The NAACP’s lawyers agreed any reversal would cause confusion, but also wrote the Republicans are unlikely to be able to overturn Biggs’ order. The civil rights groups say there’s good reason to believe provisions in the new law — which GOP lawmakers say make it easier for voters to comply — would still disproportionately harm African American voters.

“Staying the preliminary injunction at this point would lead to a dysfunctional enforcement of an unconstitutional law that would undoubtedly undermine the integrity of that election and disenfranchise North Carolina voters,” the NAACP brief read.

Related Stories
‹
NC Justices Examine Legality of Voter ID, Tax Amendments
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON More litigation on voting, redistricting and race reached North Carolina’s Supreme Court on Monday, as justices began deciding if two constitutional amendments should be struck down because lawmakers who put them on the ballot were elected thanks to distorted district boundaries. The state Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a […]
North Carolina Justices Block Certification of Election Outcome in Race for One of Its Own Seats
North Carolina's Supreme Court blocked the certification of Justice Allison Riggs so it can review legal arguments by the trailing candidate.
Republicans Challenge North Carolina Decision that Lets Students Show University’s Mobile ID
The Republican Party sued North Carolina's elections board to block students and employees at UNC-Chapel Hill from using digital IDs to vote.
Citizens-Only Voting, Photo ID and Income Tax Changes Could Become NC Amendments on 2024 Ballots
The North Carolina Senate is considering three proposed constitutional amendments designed to give voters a say in the law-making process.
North Carolina’s Voter ID Mandate Taking Effect This Fall Is Likely Dress Rehearsal for 2024
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON North Carolina’s voter photo identification law, enacted nearly five years ago by the Republican-controlled legislature but blocked by litigation, is just now getting implemented with local elections that wrap up this week. Statewide and county officials say carrying out the photo ID requirement has gone well during three tranches of contests […]
N. Carolina Justices Hand GOP Big Wins with Election Rulings
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON In massive victories for Republicans, the newly GOP-controlled North Carolina Supreme Court on Friday threw out a previous ruling against gerrymandered voting maps and upheld a photo voter identification law that colleagues had struck down as racially biased. The partisan gerrymandering ruling should make it significantly easier for the Republican-dominated legislature […]
NC Supreme Court To Hear Voter ID Arguments Next Month
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON Oral arguments over the constitutionality of North Carolina’s photo voter identification law will be held next month, the state Supreme Court has decided in another ruling determined along partisan lines. In a 4-3 decision, the justices who are registered as Democrats agreed with attorneys for minority voters who had asked the state’s […]
Voter ID Lawsuit to NC Supreme Court in Accelerated Appeal
Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The North Carolina Supreme Court has agreed to accelerate appeals in a photo voter identification lawsuit by hearing the case without waiting for the Court of Appeals to deliberate first. In an order last week, the justices granted the request of lawyers for minority voters who successfully sued at the trial-court level […]
2 N. Carolina Justices Won't Step Away from Voter ID Case
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON Two North Carolina Supreme Court justices — the son of a powerful legislator among them — said on Friday they won’t step away from hearing a case that challenges a pair of constitutional amendments, one of which mandates photo voter identification. Associate Justices Phil Berger Jr. and Tamara Barringer wrote […]
"Sordid History" Cited as Judge Blocks NC's Voter ID Law
The federal judge who blocked the newest version of North Carolina’s voter identification law cited the state’s “sordid history of racial discrimination and voter suppression” as she ordered officials not to enforce the law in 2020. U.S. District Court Judge Loretta Biggs’ decision was released Tuesday and prevents North Carolina from requiring voters to provide […]
›