Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The North Carolina Supreme Court has agreed to accelerate appeals in a photo voter identification lawsuit by hearing the case without waiting for the Court of Appeals to deliberate first.
In an order last week, the justices granted the request of lawyers for minority voters who successfully sued at the trial-court level to bypass arguments at the intermediate-level appeals court.
In September, a divided panel of three trial judges threw out the state’s latest photo ID law, which was approved by the General Assembly in late 2018, weeks after a photo ID mandate was added to the state constitution. Still, the panel’s majority declared the implementing law unconstitutional, in part because the justices said it intentionally discriminated against Black voters.
Republican legislative leaders who were sued appealed the ruling. They say there was no evidence of racial bias and that the rules ensured ballot access for all registered voters.
The attorneys for the minority voters asked the Supreme Court to take the case now because it addresses substantial legal issues. They also argued that it would help to avoid any delays in the legislature fashioning a voter ID law that complies with the constitution, which it would do if the justices uphold the trial court order.
Attorneys for Republicans wanted the case to work through the Court of Appeals first. They argued that a pending federal lawsuit challenging the same law likely won’t be resolved for at least more than a year, so accelerating the state case isn’t necessary.
The state Supreme Court didn’t say in Wednesday’s order when oral arguments would be held, but the group providing lawyers for the plaintiffs said in a news release Thursday that it expects them this summer.
The Republicans’ attorneys also argued that the lawsuit plaintiffs simply wanted to move the case to a more favorable forum with the Supreme Court. Four of the seven justices are registered Democrats. Two of the seven seats — both held by Democrats — are on the November statewide ballot. Ten of the 15 Court of Appeals judges, which usually meet in panels of three, are registered Republicans.
Arguments were held before the state Supreme Court in February in another pending case focused on the legality of the constitutional amendment requiring a photo ID to vote.
Related Stories
‹
North Carolina Justices Block Certification of Election Outcome in Race for One of Its Own SeatsNorth Carolina's Supreme Court blocked the certification of Justice Allison Riggs so it can review legal arguments by the trailing candidate.
N. Carolina Justices Hand GOP Big Wins with Election RulingsWritten by GARY D. ROBERTSON In massive victories for Republicans, the newly GOP-controlled North Carolina Supreme Court on Friday threw out a previous ruling against gerrymandered voting maps and upheld a photo voter identification law that colleagues had struck down as racially biased. The partisan gerrymandering ruling should make it significantly easier for the Republican-dominated legislature […]
NC Supreme Court To Hear Voter ID Arguments Next MonthWritten by GARY D. ROBERTSON Oral arguments over the constitutionality of North Carolina’s photo voter identification law will be held next month, the state Supreme Court has decided in another ruling determined along partisan lines. In a 4-3 decision, the justices who are registered as Democrats agreed with attorneys for minority voters who had asked the state’s […]
NC Justices Examine Legality of Voter ID, Tax AmendmentsWritten by GARY D. ROBERTSON More litigation on voting, redistricting and race reached North Carolina’s Supreme Court on Monday, as justices began deciding if two constitutional amendments should be struck down because lawmakers who put them on the ballot were elected thanks to distorted district boundaries. The state Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a […]
2 N. Carolina Justices Won't Step Away from Voter ID CaseWritten by GARY D. ROBERTSON Two North Carolina Supreme Court justices — the son of a powerful legislator among them — said on Friday they won’t step away from hearing a case that challenges a pair of constitutional amendments, one of which mandates photo voter identification. Associate Justices Phil Berger Jr. and Tamara Barringer wrote […]
North Carolina To Send Mailers to About 200,000 Voters Asking for Missing Registration InfoNorth Carolina election officials will send mailers to about 200,000 voters asking them to provide information missing from their state registration records.
Unsettled North Carolina Election Could Be Determined by Which Ballots Are Subject to Court OrdersThe exact number of ballots to be cured in the still-uncertified North Carolina Supreme Court election is causing additional legal friction.
North Carolina Supreme Court Rules Most Challenged Ballots Must Stay in Election CountNorth Carolina’s Supreme Court ruled that more than 60,000 cast ballots challenged by Jefferson Griffin must remain in the election count.
Court Directive To Notify Voters in Close North Carolina Election Blocked for NowThe North Carolina Supreme Court temporarily halted enforcement on Monday of an appeals court decision over its undecided 2024 election.
Republicans Challenge North Carolina Decision that Lets Students Show University’s Mobile IDThe Republican Party sued North Carolina's elections board to block students and employees at UNC-Chapel Hill from using digital IDs to vote.
›
