A deeply torn Senate is set to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, giving the country a ninth justice Monday as Republicans overpower Democratic opposition to secure President Donald Trumpâs nominee the week before Election Day.
Democratic leaders asked Vice President Mike Pence to stay away from presiding over her Senate confirmation due to potential health risks after his aides tested positive for COVID-19. But although Penceâs isnât needed to break a tie, the vote would present a dramatic opportunity for him to preside over confirmation of Trumpâs third Supreme Court justice.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and his leadership team wrote that not only would Penceâs presence violate Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, âit also be a violation of common decency and courtesy.â
But Senate Republicans control the chamber and Barrettâs confirmation isnât in doubt.
The 48-year-old appellate judgeâs confirmation would secure a conservative court majority for the foreseeable future, potentially opening a new era of rulings on abortion, gay marriage and the Affordable Care Act. A case against the Obama-era health law is scheduled to be heard Nov. 10.
âThis is something to be really proud of and feel good about,â the Republican leader said Sunday during a rare weekend session.
McConnell said that unlike legislative actions that can be undone by new presidents or lawmakers, âthey wonât be able to do much about this for a long time to come.â
Schumer, of New York, said the Trump administrationâs drive to install Barrett during the coronavirus crisis shows âthe Republican Party is willing to ignore the pandemic in order to rush this nominee forward.â
To underscore the potential health risks, Schumer urged his colleagues Sunday not to linger in the chamber but âcast your votes quickly and from a safe distance.â Some GOP senators tested positive for the coronavirus following a Rose Garden event with Trump to announce Barrettâs nomination, but they have since said they have been cleared by their doctors from quarantine.
The confirmation was expected to be the first of a Supreme Court nominee so close to a presidential election. Itâs also one of the first high court nominees in recent memory receiving no support from the minority party, a pivot from not long ago when a presidentâs picks often won wide support.
Barrett presented herself in public testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee as a neutral arbiter and suggested, âItâs not the law of Amy.â But her writings against abortion and a ruling on âObamacareâ show a deeply conservative thinker. She was expected to be seated quickly on the high court.
âSheâs a conservative woman who embraces her faith. Sheâs unabashedly pro-life, but sheâs not going to apply âthe law of Amyâ to all of us,â the Judiciary Committee chairman, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said on Fox News Channel.
At the start of Trumpâs presidency, McConnell engineered a Senate rules change to allow confirmation by a majority of the 100 senators, rather than the 60-vote threshold traditionally needed to advance high court nominees over objections. It was escalation of a rules change Democrats put in place to advance other court and administrative nominees under President Barack Obama.
On Sunday, the Senate voted 51-48 to begin to bring the process to a vote by launching the final 30 hours of Senate debate. Two Republicans, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, voted against advancing the nominee, and all Democrats who voted were opposed. California Sen. Kamala Harris, the vice presidential nominee, missed the vote while campaigning in Michigan.
Mondayâs final tally was expected to grow by one after Murkowski announced her support for the nominee, even as she decried filling the seat in the midst of a heated race for the White House. Murkowski said Saturday she would vote against the procedural steps but ultimately join GOP colleagues in confirming Barrett.
âWhile I oppose the process that has led us to this point, I do not hold it against her,â Murkowski said.
Collins, who faces a tight reelection fight in Maine, remains the only Republican expected to vote against Trumpâs nominee. âMy vote does not reflect any conclusion that I have reached about Judge Barrettâs qualifications to serve,â Collins said. âI do not think it is fair nor consistent to have a Senate confirmation vote prior to the election.â
By pushing for Barrettâs ascension so close to the Nov. 3 election, Trump and his Republican allies are counting on a campaign boost, in much the way they believe McConnellâs refusal to allow the Senate to consider Obamaâs nominee in February 2016 created excitement for Trump among conservatives and evangelical Christians eager for a Republican president to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
Barrett was a professor at Notre Dame Law School when she was tapped by Trump in 2017 for an appeals court opening. Two Democrats joined at that time to confirm her, but none is expected to vote for her now.
Photo via AP and Greg Nash.