North Carolina Republican legislative leaders on Monday opposed a plan by federal judges to use an outside expert to help them examine and possibly redraw General Assembly district lines, arguing that it’s premature to hire one and questioning the expert’s impartiality.

An attorney for GOP mapmakers objected to the judicial panel’s intentions — announced last week — to appoint a Stanford University law school professor as what’s called a “special master.”

The same three judges last year struck down nearly 30 districts originally drawn in 2011 by the GOP-controlled legislature, determining they unlawfully relied too heavily on race. The General Assembly approved new lines in August, but the judges wrote last week they remained concerned that seven House and two Senate districts “either fail to remedy the identified constitutional violation or are otherwise legally unacceptable.”

The judges shouldn’t appoint a special master — Stanford’s Nathaniel Persily or anyone else — until they issue a ruling that explains why the nine districts fall short legally and give the General Assembly another crack at rectifying problems, GOP lawyer Phil Strach wrote.

New districts are supposed to be used in the 2018 elections, and with candidate filing to begin in February there’s sufficient time for the state to fix any problems, Strach added.

“The legislative defendants are concerned that the appointment of a special master as described by the court will instead affirmatively obstruct the state’s ability to exercise its sovereign right to redistrict in the first instance,” he wrote.

Persily has assisted judges in drawing districts in four other states.

On Monday, Strach raised flags about Persily, saying that the professor had connections to both the chief lawyer for the voters who sued over the maps, as well as to the voters’ allies. For example, Strach pointed to a 2006 redistricting conference by the University of North Carolina Center for Civil Rights in which a document listed him as a conference presenter. Anita Earls, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, worked for the center at the time, the paper said.

Strach also pointed to Persily’s quotes in media stories about redistricting and voting laws in North Carolina and other states. Strach wrote that those stories in part exhibit “examples of possible bias” that the defendants should be allowed to ask Persily about in a court setting.

“Persily has many media appearances and published works relating to North Carolina redistricting which raise questions about his ability to fairly assess the plans before the court,” Strach wrote.

Persily filed an affidavit late last week stating he knew of no grounds that disqualified him from serving as a special master in the case.

Earls and other lawyers representing the voters who originally sued over the 2011 maps hadn’t filed any objections as of late Monday. Earls, who is now working for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, said in a release last week that it had “been shown time and again that the state legislature refuses to draw fair districts that comply with the law.”

The 2011 districts helped Republicans expand and retain veto-proof majorities, contributing to their ability to push a conservative agenda through state government. Further adjustments to the districts approved in August could help improve the Democrats’ chances to end these supermajorities.

Related Stories
‹
North Carolina GOP’s Proposed Map Seeks to Thwart Democratic Incumbent’s Reelection
North Carolina's Republican legislators are offering a redrawn U.S. House district map to help the GOP retain control of Congress.
North Carolina Redistricting Trial Begins, With Racial Gerrymandering Allegations the Focus
North Carolina districts drawn by Republicans that helped retain majorities in Raleigh and Washington are a topic in federal court this week.
NC House Minority Leader Shares Thoughts on Latest Round of Redistricting and Maps
Rep. Robert Reives II discussed North Carolina's latest redistricting efforts and his concerns over the state's lack of checks and balances.
North Carolina Republicans Put Exclamation Mark on Pivotal Annual Session With Redistricting Maps
The North Carolina General Assembly gave final approval Wednesday to new redistricting maps poised to empower the state GOP for years.
Court Opens Door To Voiding N. Carolina Voter ID Amendment
Written by JONATHAN DREW and GARY D. ROBERTSON North Carolina’s highest court opened the door Friday to nullifying a voter ID mandate approved by citizens in 2018 because the lawmakers who put it on the ballot were elected from districts tainted by illegal racial bias. However, the North Carolina Supreme Court stopped short of striking […]
NC Supreme Court OKs Speeding Up Redistricting Arguments
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON In another remapping decision along partisan leanings, the North Carolina Supreme Court has agreed to speed up arguments on further challenges to the boundaries for the state’s legislative seats and congressional districts. By a 4-3 ruling with registered Democrats in the majority, the justices granted a request by Common Cause to accelerate the redistricting […]
Justices To Hear NC GOP Appeal That Could Limit State Courts
Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear an appeal from North Carolina Republicans that could drastically limit state court authority over congressional redistricting, as well as elections for Congress and the presidency. The justices will consider whether state courts, finding violations of their state constitutions, can order changes to […]
New NC District Maps Due Feb. 18; Expert Shares Reactions to Ruling
The North Carolina Supreme Court recently struck down maps drawn by Republican lawmakers. The court said it was an act of partisan gerrymandering which violates the state constitution. Now, the North Carolina General Assembly has until February 18 to submit a new set of maps.
NC Redistricting Trial Concludes; Ruling Coming Within Days
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON A rapid trial over North Carolina’s new congressional and legislative districts concluded Thursday with closing arguments over whether the boundaries contain unlawful gerrymanders that should be replaced for upcoming elections. The three trial judges have until Tuesday to rule, the result of a directive by the state Supreme Court, which last […]
‘Concept Maps’ Revealed as NC Redistricting Trial Winds Down
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON A North Carolina state legislator who helped orchestrate redistricting in his chamber this fall acknowledged Wednesday that he examined some “concept maps” that were created quietly by someone else before he drew new boundaries in a public committee room. The testimony by House Redistricting Committee Chairman Destin Hall in a trial […]
›