Project Advance is a new payment method Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools will implement during the 2016-2017 school year.
The program would base teacher raises not on number of years in the district, but instead on professional development.
Orange County Commissioner Penny Rich said the commissioners have been receiving emails from teachers who don’t think the program is a good idea.
“These emails are disturbing to me,” she said. “You have veteran teachers that don’t feel comfortable with this program. They feel they were forced to go into the program because it was the only way they can get a raise.”
Rich said she received emails from 7 different teachers before beginning to communicate with teachers and representatives from the NC Association of Educators over the phone.
“One of the people who sent an email felt like there was retribution taken out on them,” she said. “They felt they could no longer send emails because someone was clocking the emails and they felt they were not in a safe place by sending emails anymore.”
Rich said she spoke with around 20 people over the phone after that.
Current CHCCS staff had the option of opting out of the project, but according to the Project Advance website, depending on years of service, a teacher’s supplements would stagnate and not reach the levels they could have under the previous system.
East Chapel Hill High School teacher Keith Gerdes said in an email to the commissioners that many of his colleagues chose to opt in “under duress.”
Superintendent Tom Forcella said nearly 1,000 people chose to opt in and that the district attracted new teachers because of Project Advance.
“We have done nothing to close the achievement gap, so if you keep doing what you always have done, you’ll keep getting the same thing,” he said. “And through intentional planning to reach all of the students, we will close the achievement gap.”
No teachers will receive a pay cut with the implementation of Project Advance, but those who opt in will go through a level of benchmarking that could cause them to show things such as lesson plans.
“Change is difficult,” Forcella said. “There are teachers that will tell me ‘I have 25 years of experience you mean you’re telling me I have to write a lesson plan?’ Well I’d say ‘yes, you do.'”
It is unclear what, if anything, the county commissioners can do if they have a problem with the direction of Project Advance.
Commissioners give funding to the schools and part of that funding goes towards paying the supplement provided to teachers.
Forcella said Project Advance would be cost-neutral to the district and the commissioners do not control how money is distributed.
That decision falls to the Board of Education, which has planned the project for nearly five years and multiple boards have unanimously approved it.
Project Advance is scheduled to be implemented during the next school year.
Related Stories
‹

Orange County Commissioners Consider School Budget Requests Alongside Potential Federal Funding Cuts, Tax IncreasesThe Orange County Commissioners recently met with the CHCCS and OCS boards to review proposed budgets for the upcoming school year.

Projects Designations and Total Dollars: School Bond Takes Shape with Orange County's FrameworkThe Orange County school infrastructure bond referendum planned for the fall took its latest step forward on Tuesday night.

School Boards Discuss Bond, Budget Requests with Orange County CommissionersThe Orange County Board of Commissioners recently met with local boards of education to receive their budget requests.

Orange County Approves More Than $500,000 for Community Climate Action Grant ProgramEarlier in December, the Orange County Board of Commissioners approved more than $500,000 in various grants through the county’s Community Climate Action Program. Eight programs around the county will receive funding. Three different organizations will use the money to install rooftop solar panels: Binkley Baptist Church in Chapel Hill, the Hillsborough United Church of Christ […]

Familiar Topics, Concerns Shared at Joint Orange County School Board MeetingOrange County Commissioners heard updates from Orange County Schools and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools leaders' at a recent meeting.

OC Joint School Board Meeting Focuses on COVID-19 Toll on Students, StaffOrange County Schools and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools held a joint meeting this week with the Orange County Board of Commissioners. Their discussion included mask mandates, mental health support and teacher retention – especially during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
![]()
Orange County Commissioners to Adopt Recommended Budget for New Fiscal YearThe Orange County Board of Commissioners will convene this evening to vote on spending nearly $220 million over the course of the next fiscal year. That figure represents the estimated expenditures in a proposed budget recommended by Orange County Manager Bonnie Hammersley for board member approval. Those expenditures were briefed to board members last week […]

Carrboro High School Principal Helena Thomas Reassigned; Interim To Be Named LaterCarrboro High School principal Helena Thomas is being reassigned to a new role within the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Instructional Services Division, per a release from superintendent Rodney Trice Thursday afternoon. The move will go into effect Monday, July 21. “This change is intended to support Carrboro High School in restoring stability and strengthening operations […]

Chapel Hill Approves Rezoning for Greene Tract Site, Hears Next Steps for DevelopmentThe Chapel Hill Town Council is making progress on developing the Greene Tract, meeting in June to rezone part of the site.
![]()
Speaking of Schools: CHCCS Chief Communications Officer Andy JenksAndy Jenks, the chief communications officer for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, joins 97.9 The Hill News Director Brighton McConnell on Monday, July 14.
›
So patronizing for the Superintendent to make this sound like CHCCS educators are upset about writing lesson plans. That’s ridiculous. This is not about intentional planning, that can be done through professional development without changing the way teachers are paid. To devalue classroom experience is a slap in the face, especially when coming from someone who I’m sure received pay increases based on years of experience.