Written by MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

The justices, without comment, turned away an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the high court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Davis had been trying to get the court to overturn a lower-court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney’s fees to a couple denied a marriage license.

Her lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who alone among the nine justices has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling.

Thomas was among four dissenting justices in 2015. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito are the other dissenters who are on the court today.

Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case. Alito has continued to criticize the decision, but he said recently he was not advocating that it be overturned.

Supporters of the LGBTQ+ community wave their flag in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, Oct. 8, 2019 in Washington. (Photo via AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta.)

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was not on the court in 2015, has said that there are times when the court should correct mistakes and overturn decisions, as it did in the 2022 case that ended a constitutional right to abortion.

But Barrett has suggested recently that same-sex marriage might be in a different category than abortion because people have relied on the decision when they married and had children.

Human Rights Campaign president Kelley Robinson praised the justices’ decision not to intervene. “The Supreme Court made clear today that refusing to respect the constitutional rights of others does not come without consequences,” Robinson said in a statement.

Davis drew national attention to eastern Kentucky’s Rowan County when she turned away same-sex couples, saying her faith prevented her from complying with the high court ruling. She defied court orders to issue the licenses until a federal judge jailed her for contempt of court in September 2015.

She was released after her staff issued the licenses on her behalf but removed her name from the form. The Kentucky legislature later enacted a law removing the names of all county clerks from state marriage licenses.

Davis lost a reelection bid in 2018.

Related Stories
‹
Supreme Court Allows Trump To Deport Venezuelans Under Wartime Law, but Only After Judges’ Review
The Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration can use a wartime law to deport Venezuelan migrants, but they must get a court hearing first.
Justices Rule for Trump Administration in Deportation Case
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration can deport some people seeking asylum without allowing them to make their case to a federal judge. The high court’s 7-2 ruling applies to people who fail their initial asylum screenings, making them eligible for quick deportation, or expedited removal. The justices ruled in the case […]
Migrants Languish in US Detention Centers Facing Dire Conditions and Prolonged Waits
Prolonged detention has become more common in President Donald Trump’s second term, at least partly because a new policy generally prohibits immigration judges from releasing detainees while their deportation cases wind through backlogged courts.
Homeland Security Secretary Noem Defends Trump’s Hard-Line Immigration Policies During Tense Hearing
The hearing was Kristi Noem’s first public appearance before Congress in months, testifying at the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Without Affirmative Action, Elite Colleges Are Prioritizing Economic Diversity in Admissions
Some prestigious colleges are enrolling record numbers of low-income students as an admissions tactic in the absence of affirmative action.
Interpreting the Legality of Federal Immigration Operations — Dec. 8, 2025
The Hill's Andrew Stuckey speaks with Chapel Hill Immigration Attorney Chris Barnes and University of North Carolina Law Professor Rick Su on Monday, December 8. They discuss the specific implications of federal immigration enforcement actions in the Triangle region in November. They also discuss the larger legal ramifications of recent immigration enforcement, both in national politics and as it affects people locally. They share insights on the current legal question marks surrounding immigration in the United States, talk about who is affected most by these policies, what they expect to see in 2026, and more.
On Air Today: Eliazar Posada-Orozco on the Community's Response to ICE Operations
In the wake of last week's federal immigration enforcement operation, Eliazar Posada-Orozco joins 97.9 The Hill's Brighton McConnell on Monday, Nov. 24 to share his own experience.
ICE Has Arrived In The Triangle. Here's A Guide of Resources to Use
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, officers and Border Patrol agents are active in the Triangle on Tuesday, with confirmed arrests and sightings in Raleigh and Durham. Below is a guide of resources compiled by Chapelboro to track confirmed ICE sightings, track any detainees and stay informed about your rights. Here is what […]
Orange County Elected Officials Share Support of Local Families, Speak Out Against ICE Raids
Elected officials in Orange County affirmed their support of immigrant community members and criticism of federal efforts that recently brought U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents to North Carolina through a statement on Tuesday. As part of President Donald Trump’s administration’s policy goal to crack down on illegal immigration — and […]
Supreme Court Rejects Call to Overturn Its Decision Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide
The justices turned away an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
›