The Chapel Hill Town Council (CHTC) has banned the use of all types of cell phones by drivers: both the handheld and the hands-free as of June 1. If you’re a regular Chapelboro reader, you probably know this. What you might not realize is what it may cost you and I’m not talking about the $25 fine.
Here’s the scoop: this ban will end up in court and the town will have to pay to defend it and council members knew that and decided to spend our tax dollars (and/or staff time- which we also fund) doing so.
I keep hearing about priority-based budgeting, that we’ll have to make tough choices about what to fund, that our already high taxes will have to go up…. and now, this little expected expenditure. Really people? This is your priority?
In a terrifically thorough discussion of the likely court arguments, WCHL News Director Aaron Keck and Legal Analyst Hampton Dellinger explain why this ban may be unenforceable. There’s even an opinion from the North Carolina Attorney General’s office saying so and guess what? That opinion was available to the CHTC before members voted.
I too have seen drivers oblivious to all else but their phones, weaving and dawdling their way through traffic. Somehow I know they’re on the phone because they are using one of their hands to hold the device instead of the steering wheel. “Both hands on the wheel,” my driver’s ed. teacher told me.
So if hands-free devices are also being banned, I bet the phone lines are jammed at Performance Automall to make appointments to remove car radios (perish the thought!). Also, the Chapel Hill Town Council must be moving some priority budgeting over to childcare because I certainly can’t be talking to my child in the backseat; that’s a hands-free conversation too. Also, inventors must be furiously working on patented devices to detect chewing gum and Chapstick that may also be illegal to use inside my vehicle.
I’m not advocating distracted, unsafe driving; I’m saying that each driver is licensed and is required to pay attention. Once we get beyond the rule of both hands on the wheel, we’d have to start regulating daydreams, laughter, rubbernecking and dozens of other hands-free distractions that happen to all of us at some point when we’re driving. While I think this is impossible, as is the upcoming ban, I think the bigger problem is a question of those darn priorities.
I submit that all elected officials need to look at the biggest possible picture when making decisions and voting on laws, plans, bans, etc. This ban reeks of being voted on in the abstract, in a world where taxes and budgets and residents in need are on the periphery. It’s nice to take a utopian stand but only when we live in Utopia.
Share your thoughts by leaving a comment below or write to me at Donnabeth@Chapelboro.com.
Related Stories
‹

Top Stories of 2025: A Year of Change for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City SchoolsWhile the academic calendar goes from July to June, this calendar year for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools was filled with major stories.

10 Years After NC Supreme Court Ruled Against Chapel Hill, Cash-Only Towing Fees RemainSome local businesses have earned reputations for aggressive towing enforcement. A Supreme Court case involving Chapel Hill ten years ago played a part in why they're still allowed.

Chapel Hill Warns Residents, Motorists of Towing Due to House RemovalUsually when someone is “moving down the street,” it doesn’t mean their entire building is coming with them. But that’s the case for one property in Chapel Hill on Saturday. The Town of Chapel Hill is moving a house in the 100 block of North Street to the Northside neighborhood following the town’s purchase of […]
![]()
N.C. Supreme Court To Review Chapel Hill's Cell Phone Ban And Tow RulesThe North Carolina Supreme Court announced Friday it will hear the case involving the Town Of Chapel Hill’s cell phone driving ban and towing rules.
![]()
Kleinschmidt: Hands-Free Phone Option While Driving Should Be Considered CHAPEL HILL – Chapel Hill Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt championed the ruling of the state Court of Appeals Tuesday that reversed a previous lower court ruling to strike down Chapel Hill’s ordinances on regulating towing companies. Kleinschmidt says the court gave the proper authority back to the town regarding towing regulations—but a part of the ruling […]
![]()
The Luxury of DisagreementI have written derisively of using town dollars to defend a hands-free cell phone ban (when the town was even on notice it wouldn’t hold up in court). The notion that it can be handled by attorneys already paid by the town made no difference to me because their salaries are still town dollars (tax […]
![]()
Follow-up Questions: Towing, Teachers, & Opportunity CostWord that Chapel Hill is going to continue the legal fight and appeal a judge’s ruling against a planned cell phone ban (including hands-free use) and a towing ordinance prompts a few questions: First of all, I keep hearing and reading that downtown businesses must use towing companies and aggressive towing tactics in order to […]
![]()
Cell Phones, Towing, & TeachersBack in April I wrote about the Chapel Hill Town Council (CHTC) banning both handheld and hands-free cell phone use by drivers (with limited exceptions). The point of my column then was not to root for distracted driving; it was to point out the pointless use of public (staff) time and money in defending […]
![]()
Not-so-Savvy SpendingThe Chapel Hill Town Council (CHTC) has banned the use of all types of cell phones by drivers: both the handheld and the hands-free as of June 1. If you’re a regular Chapelboro reader, you probably know this. What you might not realize is what it may cost you and I’m not talking about the […]
›