What’s wrong with the new NCAA rules? Almost everything.
I would say, “Have you ever heard of anything so silly?” But the answer is, “Yes we have, because it’s the NCAA.”
Critics from coaches to former players to broadcasters to lawyers have come out en masse against the new set of convoluted NCAA rules that were thrust upon college basketball this week without running them by any kind of focus group.
Yes, some high school players will be able to jump right to the NBA, whenever the NBA Players Association gets around to changing the minimum age limit of 19. The NBAPA immediately responded that the earliest that will happen is 2022. Meanwhile, the NCAA says all the others will have to stay in college at least two years before turning pro. Huh?
Yes, certain players will be able to enter the NBA draft and return to school if undrafted, but only those players who qualified in some new top 100. The NCAA put that upon the NBA and USA Basketball, neither of which is in the business of ranking high school or college players.
But a player who enters the draft and waits until after the draft cannot return to his college if the coach has already given the player’s scholarship away and there are no more left to give. Coaches are already put in a bind by the current rule that players can enter the draft and return to school before the draft. So are they really going to wait until after the draft in June to try to fill the hole that was just created on their team?
In terms of enforcement, two outside committees will now investigate violations and recommend penalties, but the NCAA has to accept those recommendations. Just wait until a school is about to get slapped hard with a two — or three — year post-season ban and suspension of the head coach.
You think that school’s president, AD or conference commissioner is not going to put pressure on the NCAA to go easy or, next year, lobby to change that particular rule?
It is chaos in the making. Who is surprised that the NCAA wants to show how tough it is by asking some outside entity do the dirty work?
In the long run, few of these new rules will fly, so ultimately the Rice Commission will have to go back to the drawing board. Or disband and let someone else try.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe:
Related Stories
‹

Chansky's Notebook: Double DominanceTwo of Carolina’s Hall of Fame coaches did it for the 22nd time Sunday. Granted, Mack Brown and Roy Williams get most of the national attention because they coach the two biggest sports at UNC. But while both the football and basketball Tar Heels were not playing over the weekend, Anson Dorrance and Karen Shelton showed again they’re the […]
![]()
Chansky's Notebook: Virginia's Chance At LastThe pressure is off for Virginia, that means a ‘Hoos who’s who. After UVa’s improbable comeback to win the Elite Eight, coach Tony Bennett was all smiles until asked what it meant to be going to his first Final Four as a head coach and his school’s first in 35 years. Bennett turned serious and […]
![]()
Chansky's Notebook: Time Out For HockeyThe next NCAA tournament report is interrupted by . . . While they are still holding on to a playoff spot, the Carolina Hurricanes certainly deserve props for rallying from another bad start to contending for their first trip to the NHL playoffs since three years after their one and only Stanley Cup in 2006, […]

Chansky's Notebook: On To The Next OneI love a coach who no longer has to prove anything. When people ask me about Roy Williams, I give them my opinion: he’s just a good ol’ guy, using the adjective that Williams often does when referring to himself in the third person. In the 31 years as a head coach, Williams has won […]

Chansky's Notebook: The Great American DivideWhat a Sunday afternoon for Duke and President Trump. Let’s just say, for argument’s sake, that half the country is split down the middle on Duke basketball and President Donald J. Trump. How could you possibly ignore the juxtaposition of the Blue Devils’ last-second escape in the NCAA tournament and the Prez’s acquittal from the […]

Chansky's Notebook: Monday Night Showdown?Is this the year for Duke-Carolina IV? Jay Bilas thinks so. Most college basketball fans cannot believe, with the schools going to the post-season virtually every year, that Duke and UNC have never met in the NCAA tournament. The Blue Devils and Tar Heels did play in the NIT semifinals back in 1971, with Carolina winning […]

Chansky's Notebook: Road WarriorsIf the Tar Heels are truly a great road team, they’ll have to show it. Carolina has nothing to complain about with its No. 1 seed in the Midwest Region, although it would have been interesting to see if anything changed with a win over Duke instead of a one-point loss at the buzzer. The […]

Chansky's Notebook: Will The Chalk Hold Up?The real ACC tournament begins today — with an asterisk or two. The chalk has prevailed so far at the ACC tourney in Charlotte, with the top eight seeds playing in today’s quarterfinal games. Seems like the old days when there were only eight schools in the original ACC, not the current subway jam of 15. But for the […]

Chansky's Notebook: Greatest Of This TimeTodd Melet) Going to Charlotte, the Roy vs. K debate doesn’t seem close. The so-called GOAT arguments are always tinged by bias for your favorite team or sentimentality. Some people still think Joe Montana is the greatest quarterback of all time when Tom Brady now has two more Super Bowl rings. The […]

Chansky's Notebook: Beware The Blow ByTransition defense will be the key to the Carolina-Duke rematch. So many angles exist for Saturday night’s blockbuster on ESPN, which strangely chose the 6 pm starting time after Zion’s injury and conflicting prognoses from Coach K’s day-to-day diagnosis and word from the Duke medical center that it was a 4-6 week knee sprain. And […]
›