Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Plaintiffs in long-running North Carolina school funding litigation have asked the state’s highest court to decide whether a trial judge’s directive to send $1.75 billion from government coffers to state agencies to address inequities is lawful.

Lawyers representing school districts and parents on behalf of their children filed two separate appeal notices dated Wednesday with the state Supreme Court.

They are unhappy with last month’s decision by a Court of Appeals panel that blocked Superior Court Judge David Lee’s order to send the money from being enforced, and want the justices to get involved.

Lee is overseeing the litigation known as “Leandro,” named for one of the plaintiffs in the original lawsuit filed in 1994.

The judge declared last month that he had authority to direct funds from the state treasury because elected officials had failed repeatedly to comply with previous Supreme Court rulings that declared the state constitution gives children the “opportunity to receive a sound basic education.”

The $1.75 billion would cover two years of a remedial spending plan. It was developed by an outside consultant with input from Gov. Roy Cooper’s office and the State Board of Education.

Republicans leading the General Assembly said Lee had no such power, since appropriating state funds rests solely with the legislature. A majority on a Court of Appeals panel, responding to a request for intervention by State Controller Linda Combs, agreed Nov. 30 that Lee overstepped his bounds and blocked the transfer.

The plaintiffs’ lawyers question whether the appeal panel’s quick ruling ran counter to rules of appellate procedure, as well as to the state constitution and Supreme Court opinions. Lee wrote last month that a portion of the constitution addressing the right to education in part gave him the authority to appropriate funds for education without a specific law of the General Assembly.

“The children of North Carolina have waited long enough for vindication of their constitutional right to the opportunity for a sound basic education and deserve no less,” wrote Melanie Dubis, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers, to the Supreme Court.

Last week, House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger asked Lee that they be allowed to formally intervene as defendants in the Leandro case. Lee’s order effective challenges the state budget that the General Assembly approves, as well as the legislature’s constitutional authority, the GOP leaders’ attorneys wrote.

Cooper, a Democrat, sought unsuccessfully for the remedial plan to be funded in the recently passed budget law.

 

Photo via the North Carolina Judicial Branch.

 

Related Stories
‹
North Carolina Supreme Court Throws Out Longtime Suit Over Education Funding
On Thursday, the North Carolina Supreme Court threw out longtime Leandro Case ruling and litigation over education funding in the state.
Robert's Rules: Leandro Limbo, Roles of the Legislature and Private School Drawbacks
North Carolina House Minority Leader and Chatham County Representative Robert Reives speaks with 97.9 The Hill on Wednesday, February 28.
N. Carolina Justices Weigh Who Has School Spending Authority
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON North Carolina’s highest court returned Wednesday to an education funding case originating almost 30 years ago, hearing arguments over whether a judge had unilateral power to allocate hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars to address unresolved student inequities. Attorneys for students, their parents and state government’s executive branch contend it […]
Judge: N Carolina Must Spend $1.75B to Narrow Education Gap
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON A North Carolina trial judge on Wednesday ordered the state to pay out $1.75 billion to help narrow the state’s public education inequities, angering Republicans who said the directive usurps lawmakers’ constitutional authority over state coffers. Superior Court Judge David Lee, who is charged with overseeing corrective responses to school […]
Engrossed in Education Funding Dispute, North Carolina Revisits Milestone 2022 Ruling
North Carolina's Supreme Court returned Thursday to its landmark 2022 ruling in the Leandro Case. Republican lawmakers want it pulled back.
Long-Running North Carolina Education Case Will Return Before the State Supreme Court in February
Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS More arguments in education funding litigation that goes back nearly 30 years are scheduled for early next year at the North Carolina Supreme Court. The state’s highest court is revisiting the case originally known as “Leandro” with oral arguments it has now set for Feb. 22. That will be less […]
N. Carolina Governor Talks Prosperity, Culture War Warning
Written by GARY D. ROBERTSON and HANNAH SCHOENBAUM North Carolina Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper urged legislators on Monday night to keep fueling opportunities for the state’s citizens to succeed through more monetary investments in K-12 education, mental health services and public safety. “Our moment to build enduring prosperity is now. And I know that North […]
New Judge Taking Over North Carolina School Funding Case
Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A new trial judge is presiding over a long-running North Carolina school funding case — in particular compliance with a recent state Supreme Court ruling that declared the judicial branch correctly ordered funds be spent to address education inequities. Chief Justice Paul Newby assigned Superior Court Judge James Ammons last week to […]
NC’s Highest Court Again Weighs in on School Funding Case
Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS North Carolina’s highest court is considering whether it was within a trial judge’s power to unilaterally order taxpayer money be sent to government agencies to address stubborn educational inequities. The state Supreme Court scheduled oral arguments on Wednesday in another chapter of a decades-long legal struggle over public education spending and a […]
Lawyers Want NC Justice to Stay Out of School Funding Case
Written by THE ASSOCIATED PRESS A North Carolina Supreme Court justice should stay out of ruling in a longstanding public education funding case because many years ago she represented some of the plaintiffs in the litigation and filed briefs in the matter, Republican legislative leaders said Wednesday. Lawyers for House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate […]
›