Written by HANNAH SCHOENBAUM
A ban on green investing has cleared North Carolina’s GOP-controlled legislature as part of a broader Republican crusade against big businesses that champion sustainability and workplace diversity.
The measure, which won final legislative approval Tuesday, bans state agencies from using “environmental, social and governance” standards to screen potential investments, award contracts or hire and fire employees. It also says the state cannot weigh how a company promotes sustainability, engages with its community or structures its leadership to support those goals.
At least two other states — North Dakota and Idaho — have already enacted laws banning such criteria. And elected officials in several other red states have derided them as “woke” or proposed similar policies to stop investors who contract with states from adopting them.
The Senate voted 29-18 along party lines on Tuesday after the House passed the bill with veto-proof margins in May. It now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, who could sign it, veto it or allow it to become law without his signature.
Cooper, who has not indicated whether he will veto the bill, has only picked fights with the legislature’s Republican supermajority on a few contentious issues this session and has been unable to block any bills.
Sen. Dave Craven, a Randolph County Republican and primary sponsor, said the bill “ensures that our pension fund is solvent” by requiring the state to prioritize financial considerations over social or environmental factors.environmenta
Effective as soon as it becomes law, it would require the state treasurer to solely consider factors expected to have a material effect on the financial risk or financial return of an investment. State Treasurer Dale Folwell, a Republican candidate for governor in 2024, supports the bill.
But several Democrats in the House and Senate raised alarms throughout the legislative process that the bill does not clearly lay out the specific criteria it prohibits.
Democratic Sen. Graig Meyer of Orange County worried it would confuse state agencies and lead some of the state’s largest employers to believe they’re being discouraged from making their own decisions about how to run their business.
“While we’re trying to build a strong business and employment climate, I do not think that the General Assembly should be hostile to those interests in the bills that we pass,” he said Tuesday during floor debate.
Related Stories
‹

Supreme Court Holds Arguments in UNC Admissions Trial; Chancellor Proud of 'Strong Case'UNC has maintained its argument that consideration of race in admissions promotes diversity and is better for its campus at large.

UNC Set For Return to Court in Ongoing Admissions LawsuitThe next chapter in a years-long lawsuit between UNC and an anti-affirmative action group is set to begin on Monday. The university looks to begin its defense in a case filed by Students for Fair Admissions Inc. against UNC’s admissions practices. Set to be held in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, the […]

Supreme Court Rules in UNC's Case Over Affirmative Action, Ends Race Consideration in AdmissionsThe U.S. Supreme Court announced its ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina on Thursday, effectively ending decades of the practice of affirmative action in college admissions and a nearly ten-year lawsuit against the Chapel Hill school. The court’s conservative majority led the ruling that UNC’s, and Harvard’s in a […]

UNC Chancellor Speaks on Admissions Changes, New Financial Aid Plan Ahead of 2023-24 ClassesUNC officially opened up its doors to students who are living on campus this week, as it welcomes undergraduates back ahead of the start of classes on Monday. While the past academic year went relatively smoothly for the student body – compared to recent examples of Silent Sam controversies and the COVID-19 pandemic […]

UNC Organizations Plan to Still Champion Diversity in Wake of SCOTUS RulingSome UNC students and faculty groups say they will continue to push for diversity on campus despite the ruling against affirmative action.

Civil Rights Leaders Visit Chapel Hill, Advocate for SCOTUS ExpansionAs the country awaits a ruling on the future of affirmative action in higher education, civil rights leaders visited Chapel Hill.

UNC May Keep Affirmative Action in Admissions, Judge SaysA federal judge has ruled that North Carolina’s flagship public university may continue to consider race as a factor in its undergraduate admissions, ruling against a group that argued the practice disadvantaged white and Asian students. U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs ruled late Monday that the University of North Carolina has shown that it has […]

UNC Trustees Talk Affirmative Action, Accessibility at First Meeting of 2023-24UNC Board of Trustees officially barred use of 'race, sex, color or ethnicity' in admissions, complying with Supreme Court case decision.

UNC Announces Plans of 'Free Tuition' for Certain Undergraduate StudentsUNC’s flagship campus announced another step to improve affordability and access to North Carolinians, sharing plans to provide free tuition and fees to certain undergraduate students beginning in 2024. UNC Chancellor Kevin Guskiewicz sent a message to the campus community on Friday afternoon, saying students from North Carolina whose families make less than $80,000 a […]
![]()
North Carolina Republicans Send Green Investment Ban to GovernorWritten by HANNAH SCHOENBAUM A ban on green investing has cleared North Carolina’s GOP-controlled legislature as part of a broader Republican crusade against big businesses that champion sustainability and workplace diversity. The measure, which won final legislative approval Tuesday, bans state agencies from using “environmental, social and governance” standards to screen potential investments, award contracts or […]
›
Comments on Chapelboro are moderated according to our Community Guidelines