After waiting years, it had seemed like the NCAA investigation of UNC was nearly over, but the NCAA reset the clock with a new notice of allegation released Monday.
“There seems to be a general feeling of relief around Chapel Hill,” said former UNC lineman Mike Ingersoll. “I feel that same sense of relief because for the past six years now, myself and the rest of teammates have had to defend our degrees.”
Many have interpreted it as a positive for the university because the focus has seemed to shift away from men’s basketball and football.
Neither program is directly mentioned in the new notice, which alleges former UNC women’s basketball athletic academic counselor Jan Boxill provided impermissible academic assistance.
Orange county commissioner and sportswriter Barry Jacobs said the outcome of the notice isn’t surprising.
“On the other hand I thought it was disappointing because there are plenty of places, whether in the Wainstein Report or other places where it’s pretty clear that a competitive advantage was gained by keeping players eligible by steering players to certain classes,” Jacobs said.
But Unverified director Bradley Bethel expressed his disagreement with Jacobs.
“What’s clear to one person is often really the picture they’ve painted in their mind,” Bethel said. “It’s not clear to me at all what Barry said that there was all of these examples of competitive advantage and what not.”
The university is also accused of not sufficiently monitoring the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes in the formerly-known African and Afro-American Studies department from the fall of 2005 through the summer of 2011.
UNC professor Deborah Stroman said even before the Waintstein Report was commissioned, the university implemented over 70 changes to ensure another academic scandal would not happen.
“The faculty is very very mixed on this,” she said. “I know there are some faculty members who are disappointed they’re viewed as people who aren’t doing their job. Having someone come and look in your room to see whether you’re teaching your class is very disturbing and quite frankly disrespectful to us.”
But Stroman said there are also professors who don’t mind the changes because they know it will prevent another scandal.
UNC has 90 days to respond to the allegations.
While no timetable has been given for the conclusion of the investigation, it could extend into next year.
Related Stories
‹
![]()
UNC Submits First Monitoring Report To SACSUNC sent its first monitoring report to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools March 11. SACS informed the university last June that they would be maintaining their accreditation, but UNC would be placed under a one year probation as a result of the academic scandal in former African American Studies Department. Part of the report […]
![]()
So They Are All, All Honorable MenIn the foulness of the ongoing athletic/academic scandal at UNC, former Governor Jim Martin has brought an honorable breath of fresh air. Many were critical of Martin’s December 2012 report of his investigation into “serious anomalies” in the Department of African and Afro-American Studies. He characterized the scandal as academic, confined to one department. Subsequently, […]
![]()
UNC Posts Letter from SACSUNC has made public the July 1 letter it received from the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). That letter informed the university SACS was placing it probation for 12 months due to an academic fraud scandal in which more than 3,000 students received credit for bogus classes. Chancellor Carol Folt said in early […]
![]()
Failed UNC Leadership and the ANOAThe UNC response to the amended notice of allegations by the NCAA is, sadly, a missed opportunity to demonstrate leadership against the corrupt quagmire of Big Time intercollegiate sports. In announcing the release of its response, the university unconvincingly and patronizingly claimed that “the question is whether the matters raised by the allegations meet the […]
![]()
Chansky's Notebook: Unprecedented ResponseUNC took dead aim right between the NC-double A’s. Carolina has said from the beginning of this academic-athletic mess that, on the other side of it, will be a model athletic program and university in how it deals with its intercollegiate teams. Carol Folt, Bubba Cunningham and their staffs have held true to that pledge, […]
![]()
Are UNC Athletes Prepared For Life After Sports?One former UNC football player says yes.
![]()
UNC Fires 2 After Personnel Review from Wainstein ReportThe University of North Carolina has announced the completion of personnel reviews from the fallout of the Wainstein Report. UNC has terminated the employment of two individuals, permanently restricted one faculty member from future administrative responsibilities and cleared three other employees of any wrongdoing following employment reviews after the Wainstein Report. The university announced the […]
![]()
UNC Cost Associated with Wainstein Report Top $10 MillionThe residual cost of the Wainstein report came into a clearer picture on Monday. UNC estimates that more than $7.5 million was spent for services provided by three law firms and one public relations agency that were directly related to the academic irregularities of the ongoing scandal. The estimated $7.5 million expense report is in addition […]
![]()
The Wainstein Report 1 Year laterThursday marks one year since the UNC-commissioned Wainstein Report was released. In the 365 days since, both the NCAA and the university’s accrediting body, SACS, have launched new investigations into the long-running academic-athletic scandal involving paper classes and multiple lawsuits have used the document as a foundation to sue the university. Doctor Charlie Tuggle is […]
![]()
Chansky's Notebook: Vicious Cycle ContinuesWill the Wainstein Report ever go away? Not looking like it. For the media and all those ABC fans, the Wainstein Report is the gift that keeps on giving. That one last independent probe into the academic scandal, which the Board of Governors and Chancellor believed we needed, traded transparency for protection of the university’s […]
›