Was the NCAA enforcement staff hiding critical information?
On page 18 of UNC’s 73-page response to the amended Notice of Allegations is an interesting anecdote and accompanying footnote.
On March 5, 2013, the managing director of the Academic and Members Affairs (AMA) within the NCAA responded to its own enforcement staff after reading the Martin Report submitted by the university, “There are always concerns with aberrant classes comprised of a significant number of student-athletes in comparison with non-athletes; however, there is nothing definitive in the report [provided by the University] that would validate that there was a systematic effort within the African and African American Studies department motivated by the desire to assist student-athletes with maintaining their eligibility, either in how the courses were created, taught and/or how the grades awarded.”
The AMA’s conclusion confirmed that the NCAA itself had concluded that the anomalous courses and the other academic irregularities in the AFAM department did not violate NCAA rules.
Yet in the 8th footnote submitted by UNC, it was revealed that the above determination was discovered purely by happenstance on July 15, 2015, more than two years later. Despite the fact that the enforcement staff had previously agreed UNC’s outside counsel could access all materials relevant to the investigation via a secure website, this information was not included, contrary to the requirements of NCAA Bylaw 19.5.9. They were discovered by the university only because its representatives traveled to the national office to review the physical files personally.
After Miami got off with light penalties in alleged violations far more egregious than the charges against UNC, it was discovered that the overzealous NCAA enforcement staff had obtained evidence against its own procedures and perhaps illegally in the view of a court of law. A similar violation of the NCAA’s own bylaws may have occurred here when the AMA conclusion was NOT turned over to the UNC lawyers.
That is what Carolina has spent millions of dollars investigating and fighting, not necessarily the violations it may or may not have committed, but what the NCAA actually concluded and then buried.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe:
Related Stories
‹
![]()
Chansky's Notebook: Unprecedented ResponseUNC took dead aim right between the NC-double A’s. Carolina has said from the beginning of this academic-athletic mess that, on the other side of it, will be a model athletic program and university in how it deals with its intercollegiate teams. Carol Folt, Bubba Cunningham and their staffs have held true to that pledge, […]
![]()
Cunningham Says UNC Working To 'Move Forward'Things just have not gotten easier for North Carolina and athletic director Bubba Cunningham.
![]()
McCants 'Awaiting Big Pay Day' From UNC, NCAAHe says the University and the NCAA are prepared to pay him more than $300 million.
![]()
Devon Ramsay To Testify In D.C.Ramsay was declared ineligible by the NCAA for the 2010 season, but later reinstated.

Willingham Sues UNC, Asks For ReinstatementWillingham says she believes “the NCAA will need some serious help from our historians at UNC (since so many years have passed).”

Multiple UNC Athletics Programs Post Perfect Academic Progress Rates; Football Sets New HighTwelve different UNC athletic programs achieved a perfect Academic Progress Rate of 1,000 during the 2022-23 school year and 20 exceeded the national average of their respective sports in their four-year rates, according to a release from the athletic department. A highlight of the latest report is the football program, which achieved a record four-year […]

Chansky's Notebook: Not Even CloseWhenever, and if ever, the NCAA's multi-billion-dollar settlement with college athletes happens, it won’t be in the foreseeable future.

NCAA, Leagues Back $2.8 Billion Settlement, Setting Stage for Current, Former Athletes to Be PaidThe NCAA agreed to pay nearly $2.8 billion to settle a host of antitrust claims, likely setting up a revenue-sharing model in college sports.

Chansky's Notebook: Big LosersIn the House v. NCAA court case, the NCAA luxury liner is about to get shattered, and everyone on board will lose something.

Federal Judge Issues 14-Day Restraining Order to NCAA in Stein-Led LawsuitA federal judge issued a temporary, 14-day restraining order on the NCAA’s transfer waiver rule on Wednesday. It’s the latest development in a lawsuit led by a group of seven state attorneys general, including North Carolina’s Josh Stein. Under the restraining order, college athletes who were denied the opportunity to play immediately after a second […]
›
Comments on Chapelboro are moderated according to our Community Guidelines