The United States Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that same-sex couples had the right to marry under the United States Constitution.
Three North Carolina Republicans filed a bill on Tuesday saying the nation’s high court “overstepped its constitutional bounds” when making that decision. The new bill says “Marriages between persons of the same gender not valid.” House Bill 780 is titled the “Uphold Historic Marriage Act.” The bill says the North Carolina General Assembly would “declare” the 2015 ruling “null and void in the State of North Carolina.”
The proposal contends that “laws concerning marriage are for each state to establish and maintain.” That line of thinking would reinstitute North Carolina’s Amendment One banning same-sex marriage, which passed on the primary ballot of the 2012 election. That amendment was then found unconstitutional in October 2014.
Beyond contending the 2015 decision goes beyond the authority of the law, the bill says the court ruling over same-sex marriage “exceeds the authority of the court relative to the decree of Almighty God.” The bill then quotes a verse from the English Standard Version of the Christian Bible.
The proposal was quickly lambasted once it was filed on Tuesday.
North Carolina Democratic Governor Roy Cooper tweeted: “This bill is wrong. We need more LGBT protections, not fewer.”
North Carolina Democratic Party chair Wayne Goodwin issued a statement on Tuesday:
“Republicans in the General Assembly seem to have a special talent for embarrassing themselves and our state. Instead of wasting their time on hateful, discriminatory and clearly unconstitutional legislation, they should be working with Governor Cooper to improve our schools and cut taxes for the middle class.”
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina policy director Sarah Gillooly also issued a statement:
“Marriage equality is the law of the land in North Carolina and the entire nation, no matter what half-baked legal theories anti-LGBT lawmakers try to put forward. This bill is absurd, unconstitutional and further proof that some North Carolina legislators remain committed to discriminating against LGBT people and their families. North Carolina lawmakers cannot defy the U.S. Supreme Court based on their extreme personal views.”
The North Carolina Republican Party and legislative leadership had not issued statements on the legislation as of this posting.
The bill is unlikely to move forward. Two of the three legislators who sponsored HB780 also filed a bill earlier this year seeking to remove the provision from North Carolina’s constitution that would prevent the state from seceding.
Related Stories
‹
![]()
Court Strikes Down VA Same-Sex Marriage BanA three-judge panel struck down Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage Monday, a ruling that has implications for NC.

Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage and Transgender Issues Are Shifting, Gallup Poll ShowsAbout 65% of U.S. adults believe same-sex marriage should be legal, with most of the change due to dropping acceptance among Republicans.
![]()
How Senators ‘Defied Political Gravity’ on Same-Sex MarriageWritten by MARY CLARE JALONICK Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin was on the Senate floor, but her mind was on the other side of the Capitol. The House was voting that July afternoon on Democratic legislation to protect same-sex and interracial marriages in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the federal right to an abortion. […]

Supreme Court Taking up Clash of Religion and Gay RightsWritten by JESSICA GRESKO The Supreme Court is hearing the case Monday of a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples, a dispute that’s the latest clash of religion and gay rights to land at the highest court. The designer and her supporters say that ruling against her would force artists — from painters […]

Landmark Same-Sex Marriage Bill Wins Senate PassageWritten by MARY CLARE JALONICK The Senate passed bipartisan legislation Tuesday to protect same-sex marriages, an extraordinary sign of shifting national politics on the issue and a measure of relief for the hundreds of thousands of same-sex couples who have married since the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision that legalized gay marriage nationwide. The bill, which […]

Trump to Speak at North Carolina GOP Convention on June 5Former President Donald Trump will speak at North Carolina’s annual state Republican Party convention next month, party officials announced Monday. The former president will speak in person at the June 5 convention dinner in Greenville. Trump narrowly carried North Carolina in 2020 and held numerous events in the state toward the end of his campaign. […]
![]()
Francis Becomes 1st Pope to Endorse Same-Sex Civil UnionsPope Francis became the first pontiff to endorse same-sex civil unions in comments for a documentary that premiered Wednesday, sparking cheers from gay Catholics and demands for clarification from conservatives, given the Vatican’s official teaching on the issue. The papal thumbs-up came midway through the feature-length documentary “Francesco,” which premiered at the Rome Film Festival. […]
![]()
NC GOP Seeks Moving Congressional Map Case to Federal CourtNorth Carolina Republican legislative leaders are trying to move a lawsuit challenging the state’s congressional map drawn in 2016 from state court to federal court. The GOP lawmakers filed a notice Monday in the partisan redistricting litigation that voters filed last month in Wake County court, which has been ruled and upheld that state lawmakers […]
![]()
"Magistrate Recusal" Law Back In Court WednesdayCircuit court judges will determine if plaintiffs have standing to challenge NC's "magistrate recusal" law.
![]()
NC Lawmakers File Bill Banning Same-Sex MarriageThe United States Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that same-sex couples had the right to marry under the United States Constitution. Three North Carolina Republicans filed a bill on Tuesday saying the nation’s high court “overstepped its constitutional bounds” when making that decision. The new bill says “Marriages between persons of the same gender not valid.” […]
›