If you are the parent of a 13 year old suspected by the police of criminal activity, would you expect to be notified before your child is questioned? And, before the interview takes place, would you want your teenager to know that he or she could chose between answering questions or remaining silent?

These questions are raised by a case — known as J.D.B. v. North Carolina — that started in Orange County District Court and is now being considered by the United States Supreme Court. Here is how a leading blog covering the Supreme Court frames the legal issue: “Criminal suspects are entitled to Miranda warnings if they are questioned while in police custody. A person generally is considered to be ‘in custody’ if a reasonable person in the same circumstances would believe that he was not free to leave. The question is whether courts should consider the age of a juvenile suspect in deciding whether he is in custody for Miranda purposes.” (from http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/j-d-b-v-north-carolina/).

Since Miranda warnings were not given to the Chapel Hill teenager before he was questioned, and his parents were not contacted, his lawyer argues that the teen’s confession should be thrown out and excluded from the case against him (i.e. suppressed).

I attended the oral argument that took place in March before the nine US Supreme Court justices. The Court’s ruling could come any day. I’m torn. I’ve worked for years with law enforcement officials and understand well how difficult it can be to investigate crimes and protect the public. In an emergency situation or in a less formal setting than a school where teens clearly understand they are not “in custody”, the arguments in favor of allowing questioning of juveniles to take place without parental notification and Miranda rights are strong. But in J.D.B.’s case the crime, while serious, involved stolen property not violence. And the interrogation took place at school, a place where teens are compelled to be and where I would think most students feel like they have little choice but to answer every question posed by a school official or police officer.

While we all await the Supreme Court’s decision, let me know your point of view. If J.D.B. was your child, would you have wanted to be contacted before he was questioned? And do you think juveniles should be treated differently from adults when it comes to deciding whether they deserve to know what their legal rights are?

Related Stories
‹
Obama, In Speech, To Focus On Income Disparities
President Barack Obama is renewing his focus on the income gap between rich and poor.
OCR Will Investigate UNC Over Sexual Assault Cases
CHAPEL HILL – The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights has decided to go ahead with an investigation of UNC’s handling of sexual assault cases on campus. That investigation is in response to a complaint filed with the office by four current and former UNC students and one former assistant dean, Melinda Manning. […]
Disfranchisement--then and now
They “disfranchised us, and now we intend to disfranchise them.” It sounds like what North Carolina Republicans might have said behind closed doors while they were gerrymandering legislative and congressional districts to assure their party’s continuing dominance. However, the words came from a white Democratic state senator more than 100 years ago. Legendary historian C. […]
"Sexual Exploitation" Charge For Ex-UNC Employee
ORANGE COUNTY – A former UNC employee who landed in hot water last year after officials found an illegal gun in his office has now received additional charges stemming from a child pornography investigation. Charles Hitlin of Pittsboro has been charged with two counts of second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor. Prosecutors say he used […]
OFA Stay Engaged
I want to talk to everyone who put their hard work into President Obama’s re-election campaign and is now feeling a little worn out and a little disappointed that we lost in North Carolina. You need to stay involved. The Obama administration has wisely chosen to keep their base involved with governing challenges after the […]
Fiscal Cliff
I was very fortunate to receive an invitation to visit the White House last Thursday. I was among a delegation of 40 community leaders from across the state of North Carolina who were asked to join in a conversation with the White House Office of Community Engagement about the impending fiscal cliff. Now the fiscal […]
Jay Robinson's Advice For President Obama
Why doesn’t U.S House Speaker John Boehner go ahead and recognize the hard facts? The president won the election. A majority of the country wants rich people to pay more taxes while everybody else’s rates stay the same. In the end Boehner will have to give up on this issue. Some say it would be […]
Building Grassroots Support Against The Death Penalty
This is Steve Dear. And this is a call to action. North Carolina has just begun its seventh year without an execution. During these years, the overall murder rate has declined significantly. With your involvement it is possible that North Carolina will never go back to the Old South justice that brutalizes our communities. This […]
Let's Save Marriage
Many proponents of Amendment One on Tuesday’s ballot see it as a way to support traditional marriage.  I’m wondering why all their efforts are focusing on how to prevent certain marriages (same sex, which are already against the law, btw), how to invalidate other stable, long-term relationships (non-married heterosexual couples), and how to undermine the […]
Everything Changes Next Week...Unless We Stop Amendment One
I’m a Chapel Hill resident, and I’ve got something to say.   Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Durham, and a number of other towns around the state offer domestic partnerships.  That ends next week.   Unmarried heterosexual couples, and their children, enjoy certain rights in North Carolina.  That ends next week.   Unmarried victims of domestic violence […]
›