Here’s the full statement fron the UNC Board of Governors regarding the decision to oust President Tom Ross:
Joint Statement of the UNC Board of Governors and President Tom Ross
January 16, 2015
The University of North Carolina Board of Governors has decided to begin the process of leadership transition. The Board believes President Ross has served with distinction, that his performance has been exemplary, and that he has devoted his full energy, intellect and passion to fulfilling the duties and responsibilities of his office. This decision has nothing to do with President Ross’s performance or ability to continue in the office. The Board respects President Ross and greatly appreciates his service to the University and to the State of North Carolina.
The Board and President Ross have agreed that he will continue to serve with the Board’s full support until his resignation becomes effective January 3, 2016, or when his successor is in place, whichever is later. Though the timeline President Ross had for transition is different from that of the Board, he fully understands, appreciates and accepts the prerogative of the Board of Governors to select the president of the University. He has assured the Board of his full commitment to fulfilling the responsibilities of the presidency during the period of transition and to continuing to serve honorably and effectively the nation’s best public university, as well as the people of his home State of North Carolina.
The Board of Governors and the President have agreed that the January 2016 resignation date is appropriate to allow the Board to conduct a national search for the next president and to ensure an orderly transition of leadership. President Ross has also agreed to be available to advise and consult with the Board and University officials following his service as President, while he is on research leave preparing to join the faculty of the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government.
Joni B. Worthington
Vice President for Communications
The University of North Carolina
Thirty-four UNC centers and institutes could face the ax from the university’s board of governors.
That report comes from NC Policy Watch.
Closing any or all of the centers across 16 UNC campuses would be the result of up to $15 million in cuts approved by the Republican-led state legislature. The proposed cuts extend to speaker series, and other “nonacademic activities” as well.
The list was narrowed down from 237 centers and institutions that were compiled earlier this year.
Seven of the 34 current centers on the list are already under campus review.
The Board of Governors will hear presentations on Wednesday and Thursday before making final recommendations.
Groups under review for the cuts include the Research Institute for Environment, Energy, and Economics at Appalachian State University; the Institute for Civic Engagement and Social Change at N.C. Central University; and the UNC Center for Civil Rights at UNC-Chapel Hill.
NC Policy Watch quoted UNC Board of Governors member Jim Holmes, denying that the proposed cuts and closures are driven by any political agenda.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/34-unc-centers-institutes-chopping-block/The UNC Board of Governors voted to cap tuition at the state’s 16 public universities, but they say they’ll freeze student aid money at the same time.
The board unanimously approved a measure on Friday that caps tuition increases at five percent each year for the next four years. The board also placed a cap on need-based financial aid, limiting it to 15 percent of tuition revenue.
Currently, UNC-Chapel Hill and five other schools are already over that percentage. Those schools would not be required to decrease the amount of financial aid offered to students, but will not be able to increase the aid budget even if tuition goes up.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/unc-bog-votes-cap-tuition-financial-aid/UNC system leaders approved a policy Friday to reveal how tuition dollars are used to provide need-based financial aid to students enrolled in North Carolina’s public universities.
This decision was made as students from across the state rallied outside the Board of Governors meeting for debt-free college education.
Following a policy discussion Thursday, the idea for the tuition disclosure statement was presented during a budget and finance committee meeting. It called for details regarding the use of tuition, by category, for each campus for the upcoming 2014-2015 school year.
The statement seeks to divulge to taxpayers, parents and students how revenue from tuition is allocated. Some universities within the 17-campus system already make full disclosure statements available.
The measure was passed unanimously, but not before a brief debate sparked by Board Member Champion Mitchell.
Mitchell said that he acknowledges the growing need for financial aid but questioned the method of hiking the already high cost of tuition for all students.
UNC campuses have increased average tuition by 55 percent since the 2007-2008 school year, according to the Associated Press.
“We are loading this burden onto middle class students and their parents, and it has got to stop at some point,” Mitchell said.
The majority of funding for need-based financial aid comes from the federal government—more than $1 billion was granted to UNC system students last year. The state was the second largest source, but that has since changed.
Campuses within the UNC System are relying more heavily on “tuition set-aside programs” to provide funding for need-based financial aid—money that comes from tuition revenues.
As of 2014, Campus-Initiated Tuition Increase (CITI), or CITI, has become the largest non-federal source of student aid for undergraduate resident students.
And as campuses depend more on tuition set-aside programs, an increasing number of students are requiring financial assistance.
Almost 60 percent of in-state students received need-based financial aid during the 2012-2013 school year, according to UNC System staff.
“There is a time when you have got to say, ‘Let’s not make the situation any worse. That is all of I am trying to do today.’ I am saying let’s stop adding to this issue,” Mitchell said.
As the Board voted on the tuition disclosure statement, Mitchell proposed an amendment to reduce tuition for in-state students in a new master’s program at UNC and to not give any funding from tuition revenues to need-based aid.
After removing his amendment, Mitchell said it was more of a symbolic gesture to prove his point.
Several board members agreed that a “broader and more universal approach” to finding the balance between tuition allocation and need-based financial aid was appropriate.
Chairman Peter Hans said it was his intention to form a need-based financial aid committee and promised that he would take action in implementing the approved policy change by the end of 2014.
Student Protest for A Debt-Free Education
Outside the Spangler Center where the Board of Governors met, Lana Nye, a UNC student from Claremont, North Carolina, finishing her junior year, protested with about half a dozen students from the NC Student Power Union.
Their mission was to rally for a debt-free education system. They said the Board of Governors should work to ensure that incoming students graduate without debt by 2020.
As a Covenant Scholar, Nye said she had been able to attend Carolina the past three years through without loans by way of grants, scholarship, and work-study initiatives.
Nye said she was recently told that she no longer qualified for full support as a Covenant Scholar.
“I will be taking out loans for my senior year—loans that I can in no way afford. Never mind the fact that my father just emptied out any sort of savings he had on a used truck because his old one broke down. Never mind the fact that I just signed a lease on an apartment thinking that my tuition would be covered for the school year—because according to UNC, I have money,” Nye said.
The students said that this isn’t the last demonstration and that they will continue their campaign toward a debtfree education system.
New Chancellor Named For School of the Arts
The Board of Governors elected Lindsay Bierman, the current Editor in Chief of Southern Living Magazine, as the next chancellor of NC School of the Arts.
Bierman will assume his new duties August 1, succeeding former Chancellor of UNC, James Moeser, who has served as interim chancellor since last June.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc-system-leaders-ok-transparency-tuition-allocation-students-rally-debt-free-education/UNC system leaders agree that the demand for need-based financial aid will continue to grow. With that will come the challenge to find the funds to keep college accessible to students from low-income families, without placing the burden of high tuition costs on students from other socioeconomic backgrounds.
UNC-Chapel Hill Chancellor Carol Folt spoke to the UNC Board of Governors during a policy discussion Thursday on need-based financial aid within the 17-campus system.
“At Carolina, more than 40 percent of those students wouldn’t be sitting there at graduation if we were unable to provide them with need-based aid,” Folt said.
For the 2012-2013 school year, 59 percent of in-state students received need-based financial aid, according to Andrea Poole, the UNC system assistant vice president for finance.
UNC System President Tom Ross said the growing demand for financial aid is an issue impacting universities nationwide.
“The need is greater than the available dollars—no matter what the source, no matter how you put it together— the need is greater than the affordable dollars. The demographics of this state and the nation are changing in such a way that the need is going to be even greater,” Ross said.
Folt said that without appropriate state funding for financial aid, the campus would suffer in areas that keep it competitive with peer intuitions.
“I think it wouldn’t just simply be in SAT scores and valedictorians, it would also be big changes in our first generation students, our underrepresented minority students, and categories of students in this state that are really important to our success,” she said.
Western University Chancellor David Belcher with Folt on the importance of need-based financial aid, not only to the vitality of a university, but to the economic development of the state.
The federal government is the largest provider of need-based financial aid. During the 2012-2013 fiscal year, UNC system students received $794 million in federal loans and $275 million in Pell Grants, Poole said.
Two major state-funded programs for in-state students are the UNC Need-Based Grant, which allocated $122.5 million in the fiscal year 2013-2014, and the Education Lottery Scholarships, which provided $18 million.
Poole explained that Lottery Scholarships are given to students with greater need.
Each campus within the system also has its own programs to provide financial aid, such as “Campus-Initiated Tuition Increase (CITI),” which sets-aside funding for need-based financial aid from tuition revenues.
As of 2014, CITI is the largest non-federal source of student aid for undergraduate resident students.
Ross added that private universities across the country have also successfully implemented tuition set-aside programs.
Frank Grainger, Vice Chairman of the Board, said that he acknowledges the growing need for financial aid, but questioned the method of hiking tuition for all students.
“It is not a fact that they don’t need the money. We need to find a way to help them get that money. But it is not to take it from another fellow student that is in the school, regardless of what their social status is in the community or state, and give it to someone else,” Grainge said.
Regardless of socioeconomic status, Folt said that all UNC-Chapel Hill in-state students receive a significant subsidy.
The yearly cost of tuition is $24,472, for which resident students receive a $17,463 subsidy, and end up paying $7,009.
UNC-Chapel Hill in-state undergraduate students who receive need-based financial aid have a median parental income of $59,630. In comparison, North Carolina’s median household income is $46,450.
Halfway through the meeting, several Board Members said the discussion was essentially in vain due to a lack of concrete data for each university, such as information about how much tuition is set aside for financial aid.
Chairman Peter Hans tasked UNC System staff with collecting the appropriate data. He said the Board would conduct a more informed discussion at a later date.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/unc-system-leaders-debate-need-based-financial-aid/As the way need-based financial aid is allocated to students in the UNC System has changed, so have the populations that the funding serves. For the 2012-2013 school year, 59 percent of in-state students enrolled in the 17-campus system received need-based financial aid.
The UNC System Board of Governors meets Thursday to discuss the policies surrounding financial aid, such as what determines “need,” the demographics concerning which groups of students are receiving the grants, and how state aid programs can work within the federal rules, which dominate the system, to better leverage federal dollars.
The federal government is the largest provider of need-based financial aid. During the 2012-2013 fiscal year, UNC system students received $794 million in federal loans and $275 million in Pell Grants.
Two major state-funded programs for in-state students are the UNC Need-Based Grant, which allocated $122.5 million in the fiscal year 2013-2014, and the Education Lottery Scholarships, which provided $18 million.
The Board of Governors meets at 9:00 a.m. in the Spangler Center in Chapel Hill.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/unc-board-governors-discuss-need-based-financial-aid-thursday/CHAPEL HILL – About a dozen students rallied at the Board of Governors meeting Thursday, upset over two policies passed by system leaders. Students say they won’t let the matters go and will keep showing up at Board meetings until they feel their voices are heard.
UNC-CH Senior Kate Davis-Jones was one of the students who gathered at the Board of Governors meeting in protest of changes made to the drop/add policy.
“The Board of Governors has been consistently just stepping into the University, micro-managing, and sort of twisting things to the way they think the University should run,” Davis-Jones said. “They are completely by-passing any sort of criticism or input of people who are actually at the University. “
Passed by the Board of Governors in April, the policy established a system-wide drop period. It shortened UNC-CH’s current drop period from eight weeks to ten days. Any course dropped after the 10th day of the semester will appear as a withdrawal on students’ transcripts. The policy is required to go into effect by the fall of 2014.
“The wonderful thing about the eight-week drop/add policy is that it allows students to challenge themselves, and take risks with their education,” Davis-Jones said.
Davis-Jones said she wanted more transparency from the Board of Governors and also wanted the student voice to factor more into their policies.
Jan Boxill, UNC’s Faculty Chair, said at a Board of Trustees committee meeting in September that it was a “one-size-fits-all” policy that will not help Carolina’s students succeed. She said receiving a “W” on a transcript created a stigma concerning the student’s academic credentials.
Student Body President Christy Lambden told the Board of Trustees that he also was against the policy.
In 2004, UNC lengthened the drop period from six to eight weeks, according to a University publication.
When the policy was introduced in the fall of 2012, it was met with resistance from then UNC Student Body President Will Leimenstoll and the Faculty Executive Committee, who voted unanimously against the proposal.
“It implied that students shouldn’t be pushing their education to its limits,” Davis Jones said. “They shouldn’t be challenging themselves, and they shouldn’t be courageous with their electives.”
Students outside the meeting were also protesting the Board of Governor’s ban on gender-neutral housing, a program that would have allowed males and females to live together in the same University dorm suites or apartments.
The UNC Board of Trustees voted last November to allow gender-neutral housing. Former UNC Chancellor Holden Thorp backed the Trustees’ decision, saying it would help keep students safe.
However, in August, UNC System leaders overturned the Trustees’ decision, and halted the program before it could begin the pilot year. The measure passed unanimously without discussion.
UNC Senior Kevin Claybren served as the Student Coordinator of the Gender Non-Specific Housing Coalition. He was set to live with three other females in Ram Village Apartments, the first four students to participate in the program at UNC.
“Right now we are just trying to show the Board of Governors that we care about this issue,” Claybren said. “We are not going to stop talking about this issue. We will continue to keep showing up as long as it is something that matters to us. We also want to make sure that students who don’t have voices are really heard and are visible.”
The program would have allowed males and females to share bathrooms and common areas in suites or apartments, but not share the same bedroom. The program was voluntary and only available in designated buildings.
Fifty-five University departments and groups supported the program, including the UNC Parents Council, student government and the executive branch of the student government. More than 2,000 students signed a petition in favor of gender neutral housing.
Chair of the Board of Governors, Peter Hans, said at the August 9th meeting that to enacting a policy change is a two-step process. First, the measure is taken up by the Governance Board, which was done in June, and then it goes to the full Board. Hans said there was no opposition to the policy change “whatsoever.”
“Our board wants every student to be safe and comfortable and included. The Board believes there are more practical ways to achieve those goals than assigning young men and young women to the same dorm rooms and campus suites,” Hans said on August 9.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/students-say-bog-is-micro-managing-unc-ch-policies/CHAPEL HILL – The UNC System Board of Governors is set to meet Thursday, this coming the after the group received criticism from many UNC-Chapel Hill students and administrators concerning a change to the drop/add policy.
Passed by the Board of Governors in April, the policy established a system-wide drop period. It shortened UNC-CH’s current drop period from eight weeks to ten days. Any course dropped after the 10th day of the semester will appear as a withdrawal on students’ transcripts. The policy is required to go into effect by the fall of 2014.
Jan Boxill, UNC’s Faculty Chair, said at a Board of Trustees committee meeting in September that it was a “one-size-fits-all” policy that will not help Carolina’s students succeed. She said receiving a “W” on a transcript created a stigma concerning the student’s academic credentials.
Student Body President Christy Lambden told the Board of Trustees that he also was against the policy. He said once the policy is implemented, UNC’s drop/add period would be shorter than many peers institutions and could cause Carolina to fall behind academically.
In 2004, UNC lengthened the drop period from six to eight weeks, according to a University publication.
When the policy was introduced in the fall of 2012, it was met with resistance from then UNC Student Body President Will Leimenstoll and the Faculty Executive Committee, who voted unanimously against the proposal.
Board of Governor meetings are not public hearings, so if students do protest, they will likely be kept outside.
The Board of Governor’s meets at 9:00 a.m. at the Spangler Center in Chapel Hill.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/bog-to-meet-thursday-unc-students-criticize-its-adddrop-policy/UNC System Seal
CHAPEL HILL – UNC System leaders have mixed feelings about a pilot program that proposes to counter falling enrollment at six campuses by allowing a greater number of out-of-state students.
The UNC System Board of Governors discussed the measure Thursday that could allow up to 30 percent of newly enrolled students to come from outside the state, effecting the campuses of ECSU, Fayetteville State University, North Carolina A&T State University, North Carolina Central University, Winston-Salem State University, and UNC-Pembroke. Those campuses have historically served minority students.
A final decision on the measure is months away, and the policy is designed to be on a 5-year trial run.
Board member Marty Kotis said he feared the proposed policy would shift the focus away from in-state students.
“I think you have to continue to remember the citizens of this state and why this university [system] exists the way it is and why it’s not a private university,” Kotis said.
Kotis said that the Board couldn’t predict the impact of such a decision and believed that it could instead raise tuition for in-state students by shifting the burden of the cost. The policy also suggested lowering the tuition rate for counties and states that border North Carolina as system-wide measure.
“Without that hard data and without knowing the exact cost of providing that degree to those students, I don’t know if we can make any decision that is not just guessing,” Kotis said.
He added that the policy could violate the State Constitution of North Carolina. By law, enrollment of non-North Carolina freshmen is limited to 18 percent at public universities.
The proposal noted that it wouldn’t cause the number of North Carolina students admitted to decline, rather it would focus on rebuilding enrollment with more out-of-staters. The six campuses all saw revenues from enrollment fall in the past year, according to system officials.
Though the policy won’t effect the flagship university, in context, from 2011 to 2012, UNC Chapel Hill had a 0.5 percent increase in enrollment, with a total headcount of 29,278 students,
Board member Hannah Gage said she believed there were other ways to help the struggling campuses in the system and said recruiting more out-of-state students would only be a temporary fix.
“I think you can look around the country and see campuses that have struggled before and have become hybrids,” Gage said. “They have done creative things with community colleges, and some of that should be a part of the conversation before we ramp up the out-of-state numbers.”
A possible economic advantage of the policy is that almost half of the out-of-state students who attend the six campuses stay in North Carolina after graduation, according the system figures.
On a broader level, the Fall 2012 total headcount for the UNC System was 221,010 students, or an increase of 0.3 percent from the previous year. System officials noted that while the increase was notable, it was minor when compared to the previous decade’s rapid expansion.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/unc-system-considers-allowing-more-out-of-staters/Pictured and photo courtesy: UNC Senior Kevin Claybren
CHAPEL HILL – UNC Chapel Hill has endeavored to improve student safety through University-wide efforts. Some have said that gender non-specific housing, also known as gender neutral housing, a program allowing males and females to live together in the same University dorm suites or apartments, might have saved some students from facing harassment because of their sexual identities. However, it was banned last week by UNC System leaders before the program could be begin its pilot year.
UNC Senior Kevin Claybren served as the Student Coordinator of the Gender Non-Specific Housing Coalition. He was set to live with three other females in Ram Village Apartments, the first four students to participate in the gender non-specific housing pilot program at UNC, allowing males and females to share bathrooms and common areas in suites or apartments, but not share the same room.
“Our Board of Governors, the University of North Carolina’s System Board of Governors, are not focused on student safety and student success,” Claybren said. “They are focused on other things and other agendas.”
Claybren said the Board of Governors’ decision, which affects the 16 UNC System campuses, put him in a bind to find housing, and now he is living alone.
“I looked forward to being around other people who would be able to affirm my identity and I could have affirmed their identity. I looked forward to being in that welcoming and inclusive environment where people welcomed the discussion and welcomed these challenging and hard conversations,” Claybren said, adding he believes that feeling safe in a residence hall influences positive academic success.
The Coalition worked for more than two years to make the program a reality, Claybren explained. The group held a sessions in which students shared how they had been bullied.
“We knew that gender non-specific housing was a way to address the bullying and harassment that was happening in our housing experience on UNC Chapel Hill’s campus,” Claybren said.
Terri Phoenix, UNC’s LGBTQ Center Director, served on the Gender Non-Specific Housing Coalition alongside Claybren. She said that residence halls were the fourth most common location where students said they had experienced harassment because of their sexual orientation, gender identity and/or gender expression, according to UNC’s 2011 Campus Climate Report. She said that half of the students who reported harassment identified themselves as heterosexuals. Phoenix said she believed that the program would have benefited a diverse group of students.
Fifty-five University departments and groups supported the policy, including the UNC Parents Council, the student government and the executive branch of the student government. More than 2,000 students signed a petition in favor of the gender non-specific housing. Most notably, the UNC Board of Trustees approved the policy last November, championed by former UNC Chancellor Holden Thorp.
“We were able to demonstrate that this proposed policy had broad-based support from a number of student organizations and other departments. We made the case that this was an approach, one of many approaches, that we wanted to have at our disposal to ensure student safety,” Phoenix said.
Phoenix, who also served on the Sexual Assault Task Force this summer, said the point of gender non-specific housing, was not to randomly assign males and females to live together. She said it was about providing a safe environment, allowing students the opportunity to room with other people who elected to be a part of the pilot program.
“And this group of people then would have had the chance to say I want to live with these specific roommates, regardless of what their gender was, or they would have been assigned with other people who also said, ‘I have concerns about safety, I want to be in a place where people don’t have concerns about rooming with a LGBTQ person,’” Phoenix said. “That what this policy would have done, and that is what was prevented by this Board of Governors’ decision.”
Phoenix said she questioned the timing of the Board of Governor’s Decision, when students were not on campus and without hearing student or faculty comment. It not protocol, though, for the Board meetings to take public comment.
Peter Hans, Chair of the Board of Governors, replied last Friday when asked why the policy was banned:
“Our board wants every student to be safe and comfortable and included. The Board believes there are more practical ways to achieve those goals than assigning young men and young women to the same dorm rooms and campus suites,” Hans said.
Phoenix said his response was a “simplistic representation” of what the policy was.
Both Phoenix and Claybren said that despite the Board of Governors’ decision, they will continue to educate people about why gender non-specific housing is important, with the hope that the Board of Governors will revisit the policy in the future.
http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/student-signed-up-for-gender-non-specific-housing-reacts-to-ban/ 40.8°F |
| Today: 44°F / 25°F |  |
| Tomorrow | Thursday | Friday |
|  | |
| 45° / 28° | 48° / 33° | 45° / 23° |
