The request to rezone the Lloyd Farm property was taken to a public hearing last week at the Carrboro Board of Alderman’s final meeting before the summer. The neighboring community brought much concern to the discussion.
This request has been in place since 2011. The proposal went through a mediation process in an attempt to answer some of the initial questions before coming back to the board.
Those who live on the streets nearby expressed the concern of more traffic within their neighborhood. Carrboro resident James Emory said he would be concerned for the pedestrians walking in that area.
“What I’m much more disturbed about is the traffic, especially with counts of 3,000-plus cars – vehicle trips – per day. Because those cars are basically going to be exiting and maybe if we only take half of them as returning to Carrboro they will more than likely cut right through Carol Street,” Emory said. “That is a small, unsidewalked road; it is fairly close; it gets a heavy pedestrian traffic – children, small dogs, etc. It’s very alarming to me.”
Another concern that was brought up by many residents was the issue with storm water draining around the property.
“It’s what backs up when everything coming out of a parcel like this and from these vicinities around here through a lot of streams that empty into Toms Creek and others trying to work their way down to lower elevations,” Emory said. “When the water backs up, it backs up into a lot of houses and all the houses along here on James Street, along Lorraine Street, we’ve had bad flooding on Carol Street. I don’t believe that this storm water control is enough.”
Some positive comments from those who support this project included former Carrboro Mayor and State Senator Ellie Kinnaird.
“The development of this property is especially important to all who live in Carrboro. Carrboro taxes are high, forcing many to leave and many to abandon any hope of living here. The reason for our higher taxes is that there is very little commercial property to help carry the tax burden, 80 percent of which falls on home owners,” Kinnaird said. “Revenue is needed to provide the services required and that residents want to share our tax burden.”
The Board of Alderman members said they will continue to approach this project with the understanding of all positive and negative concerns. Board member Jacquelyn Gist said she understands both sides.
“We are a community, and I do not want to see our community divided over this. I believe in people’s rights to develop their property. I think we need more commercial growth,” Gist said. “I also believe that people who live in existing neighborhoods deserve not to have their lives unduly disrupted by new development.”
The public hearing for the Lloyd Farm rezoning request has been continued until the fall meetings begin. The Board of Alderman has directed staff to continue considering all concerns and discuss changes that can be made with developers.http://chapelboro.com/news/local-government/discussions-continuing-summer-carrboro-lloyd-farm-project
How do new developments improve Chapel Hill?
It’s a simple question. And it has a simple answer: New developments provide vital spaces that strengthen our community: spaces for people to live, to work, and to shop. When we provide a greater variety of spaces that work for a more diverse population, we’re a better, stronger Chapel Hill.
The way we live today in 2016 is vastly different in nearly every way from the way we lived in 1956 or 1976 or 1996 or even 2006. It’s a logical conclusion, then, that the physical character and design of our community has to be different, too.
Here’s why more spaces for people to live in, work in, and shop in are good for our community:
The right kind of development—development that doesn’t sprawl out, but instead is built up and is designed to be walkable, bikeable, and accessible by transit—brings all sorts of benefits to Chapel Hill. We should welcome it to our community so that we can thrive and lead our region and state into the future with new housing choices, new transit options, and new job opportunities, for everyone.
— Travis Crayton
Have a comment or opinion you would like to share? Submit your commentary or column for the Commentators, on WCHL 97.9FM and Chapelboro.com.
Have you driven along Elliott Road lately? The east end, between the bypass and Village Plaza stores. I have, and I wish I hadn’t. The Village Plaza Apartments, all seven stories of them, are growing fast. This project is moving right along.
Other voices, voices that we respect, tell us that we should stop our bellyaching about developers in Chapel Hill. Developers are not the bad guys, we are told. They create homes and neighborhoods where we live, raise our families, and enjoy our Chapel Hill surroundings. It’s true. They do this. Well, some of them do.
Those of us who worry about all this construction are accused of opposing change, any change. But that’s a bum rap. Of course, Chapel Hill will experience change. Change is inevitable. Some of it is good. Some of it.
Some of it is not. Look around. You can begin with the seven-story monstrosity on Elliott Road. Or drive long the north side of NC 54 east of the bypass.
So I have a serious question about some of these developments, which is simply this: How are they improving Chapel Hill? How are these buildings and altered traffic patterns making our town better? Do they add something positive?
Some do, but it’s very clear that some others fail this simple test miserably.
No, developers aren’t evil people. They would deny that they are out to destroy our once-beautiful community. Some of them just want to make a profit.
Fair enough. There’s nothing wrong with that, unless you spoil a once-beautiful town in the process.
— Raleigh Mann
Have a comment or opinion you would like to share? Submit your commentary or column for the Commentators, on WCHL 97.9FM and Chapelboro.com.http://chapelboro.com/columns/the-commentators/how-do-developments-help-chapel-hill
What must the town of Chapel Hill do to attract more high-tech commercial business?
In the ongoing debate over local development, that’s one of the biggest questions. Chapel Hillians have long been concerned about the fact that residential property owners bear the brunt of the town’s tax burden – which can drive up the cost of living in town and force lower-income residents out. One way to shift that burden is to encourage more commercial and retail development, and there is demand for it: local economic leaders have been sounding the alarm about a growing “retail gap” in Orange County, where residents go elsewhere to spend their money because the products they want aren’t available in town. (The old saw about Chapel Hill: it’s a basketball-nuts town, but where can you actually buy a basketball?) Not all retail development is desirable, though: a Walmart might move the tax-burden dial, for instance, but big-box chains don’t always mesh with Chapel Hill’s desire to promote sustainable, labor-friendly businesses. (Or, arguably, its elitism.)
That leaves commercial development – building offices, labs and manufacturing facilities for businesses, particularly high-tech businesses in emerging industries whose values align with Chapel Hill’s. There’s demand for commercial space too: HB2 notwithstanding, the Research Triangle as a whole has developed a nationwide reputation as a technology hub, and UNC produces a steady stream of high-tech local startups. Regionally, Google Fiber is laying the infrastructure to make the Triangle a tech hub, and AT&T is laying its own fiber network in Chapel Hill as well. The only problem is a lack of space: there may be lots of high-tech businesses who want to set up shop in Chapel Hill, but where’s the commercial space to house them all?
That’s an issue town officials have been tackling for years. Chapel Hill is now home to several incubators for local startups – most notably LaUNCh and the 1789 Venture Lab, both downtown – and the town has already approved the construction of about a million square feet of commercial space. But it’s not easy: some of that construction is on hold until developers secure committed tenants, and prospective tenants generally don’t want to have to wait before moving in. In addition, UNC pharmacologist Rudy Juliano says much of that new development would consist of “dry” office space – but high-tech businesses also need “wet” laboratory space as well. And while smaller companies generally seek Class B or Class C office space, almost all new commercial development is Class A – pricier than they can afford, with more amenities than they need. (Cities like Durham have been able to avoid this problem by renovating old warehouses and other pre-existing buildings – but Chapel Hill doesn’t have as many old warehouses to retrofit.)
With all this in mind, Chapel Hill Alliance for a Livable Town (CHALT) is hosting a public forum this Tuesday, June 7, called “Nurturing High Technology Businesses in Chapel Hill.” Rudy Juliano will moderate the forum; panelists will include Michelle Bolas, UNC’s Vice Chancellor for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, as well as two UNC-based startup founders – Natalia Mitin, who decided to move her business out of Chapel Hill, and Jude Samulski, who decided to keep his business in town.
Rudy Juliano spoke last week with WCHL’s Aaron Keck.
The public forum will take place from 6-8 pm at Extraordinary Ventures on S. Elliott Road. It’s free and everyone’s invited.http://chapelboro.com/news/development/bringing-high-tech-business-to-chapel-hill-or-keeping-it-here
Jared Martinson from MHAworks Architecture presented his company’s plan for a new development on 322 West Rosemary Street, the current location of Breadmen’s.
“Where we are today is with a multi-generational and mixed-use building,” he said. “That included affordable housing that targets 50 percent AMI, as well as market rate apartments. It also includes community use, mercantile and business opportunities, specifically fronting Rosemary Street.”
The developer has not officially submitted an application.
The presentation given in the Chapel Hill Town Council meeting Monday evening was for the council to give suggestions on the project.
“As we look at Rosemary Street, while it may not be Franklin Street, it should be the second most important street in town,” said councilman Michael Parker. “We have to start working at that proactively so my major concern is probably the lack of street activation.”
Under the plan presented to the council, the developer would not build the affordable housing units, but would donate the land to an organization that would.
Parker, along with other council members, said the developer would have to have an agreement before they would approve the building permit.
“I would have a very hard time approving a project such as this, absent some firm commitment from somebody to actually fund it,” Parker said. “Rather than hope you’ll fund it and two years go by and the project either fizzles or you come back with a modification.”
Community input at the meeting was mixed, with some residents supporting the expansion of affordable housing, while others expressed concerns over the impact on the Northside Community.
Councilman George Cianciolo said his vote for the project hinged on the acceptance of the community.
“This really needs to be project where the community comes forward and says ‘we want this,'” he said. “That they feel they’re getting what they need out of it while (the developer) is getting what (the developer) needs.”
The developer will host 5 focus meetings throughout June and July to try to work with residents and alleviate their concerns.http://chapelboro.com/featured/chapel-hill-town-council-discusses-rosemary-street-development
After issuing a request for proposals, Chapel Hill will investigate the financial impact of a proposed six-story development on Franklin Street.
“It’s about 95,000 square feet,” said town manager Roger Stancil. “With the first floor being a retail, music venue-type use, the second floor being office space and music venue-type use, the third floor being office space.”
Floors four, five and six will be dedicated for affordable housing. Each floor will have 13 affordable housing units.
Still in the early stages, the potential development would be at 415 W. Franklin St., which is the current location of a public parking lot.
“To make this project work requires a parking deck to be built to add parking capacity to downtown,” Stancil said. “The proposal is to build a 450-space parking deck to replace approximately 150 existing surface spaces.”
The town currently owns the space where the building would be, but mayor Pam Hemminger said the town does not own the space where the proposed parking deck would be.
She said there was still a lot the council needed to know before making a decision on the property.
“There are property tax implications, which will be part of the financial model,” she said. “There’s also parking income versus leasing versus how it all shakes out whether the town ends up owning the lot or whether the developer ends up owning the lot.”
The town council unanimously approved a motion to allow Stancil and the town staff to continue learning about and discussing the possible development.
Stancil said in June he would present the council with his findings.
At that point the council would decide whether or not to proceed with the development.http://chapelboro.com/featured/town-council-considers-franklin-street-development
When it comes to the rumors of a Target coming to Chapel Hill, mayor Pam Hemminger can’t say much.
“I can’t confirm or deny the story,” she said. “But I will tell you, wouldn’t it be exciting to have what’s called a Metro Target? I’ve been to a few in other cities.”
If a Target were to move in to Chapel Hill, it would be at Carolina Square, formerly University Square on Franklin Street.
Hemminger said it could take up nearly 16,000 square feet of retail space in the complex, which would be almost all of the retail space available.
“It’s usually a two-level store that provides groceries and other types of things,” she said. “Wouldn’t that be fabulous for our downtown residents that live there in Northside and along Franklin Street and students to be able to have some grocery opportunities there?”
Hemminger said the possibility of a Target has not changed any development plans.
“It’s still going to have the commercial office space,” she said. “Still going to have the residential space. Still going to have the performing arts center. Still going to have the green space. Still going to have 880 parking spaces.”
Construction on the 123 million dollar mixed-use space began in October.
UNC has been a major partner in the project so far, already committing to half of the office space when it is scheduled to open in August 2017.http://chapelboro.com/featured/retail-superstore-target-could-come-to-chapel-hill
The master plan for the proposed Collins Ridge development in Hillsborough was approved by the Board of Commissioners at its meeting on Monday night.
Hillsborough Mayor Tom Stevens says that the developer has altered its plan to include more affordable housing after several public hearings.
“We had concerns about the level of affordable housing,” Stevens said. “The developers had originally proposed something like 40 units and then they came back when we just didn’t feel like that was adequate.
“They couldn’t do that with units for sale, but they came back [and] working with CASA we could do rental units.”
Stevens says by working with Community Alternatives for Supportive Abodes, CASA, the developer will be able to provide 88 affordable rental units.
The Collins Ridge project would be located on about 125 acres on the eastern end of Orange Grove Street in central Hillsborough.
The master plan, which has now been approved, states that no more than 1,038 units will be permitted on the property.
The town’s planning board had recommended that the master plan be approved with specified conditions, and Stevens says most of the continuing concerns will be handled as the developer moves through the remaining approval process.
“[The master plan] specifies a little bit about the streets, what kind of amenities would be done,” Stevens says, “but it isn’t a specific plan for each one of those parcels.”
Stevens says now that the master plan has been approved, the developer will have to come back to the board and apply for a special use permit.
“That would have a lot more details about lighting and where specifically the roads are and how many units and what setbacks were,” Stevens says of the potential Special Use Permit. “A lot of those things that are of concern we really won’t even see until the SUP.”
Stevens says another concern has been the amount of traffic the development would add to the historic town continues as it continues to expand housing availability.http://chapelboro.com/news/development/hillsborough-approves-master-plan-for-1000-unit-development
The debate over what to do with the 36-acre property soon to be the former home of the American Legion is far from over.
“We have this opportunity now,” Mayor Pam Hemminger said during the town council’s work session Wednesday night. “I wanted to hear whether the council wanted to look for other options or let it go down the development path that has been proposed at this point in time.”
American Legion entered a contract to sell the property to Woodfield Acquisitions for $10 million.
The Town of Chapel Hill had the option to buy the property for $9 million, but waived its right to first refusal in a closed-session meeting in November.
The decision was made just after the November election, when a new mayor and three new council members were elected.
Councilwoman Maria Palmer was in the closed-session and said the town did not have the money to purchase the property.
“Help me understand how, just because there was an election, all of a sudden we can come up with $10 million,” she said.
Woodfield builds multi-family homes and apartment complexes. Along with these complexes, Woodfield is also considering building office or retail spaces, but their deal is contingent on the developer receiving a special use permit from the town.
Should they not receive an SUP, Hemminger said the town could possibly use bond money to help purchase the property or enter into a partnership with a private business.
“There’s different partnerships that are available if we choose to make those kinds of things a priority,” Hemminger said. “There is a contract on this property, but it hinges on upzoning this property to be more dense and we control if that happens or not.”
Hemminger suggested moving some or all of the $8 million allocated in the recent bond for parks and recreation towards purchasing the property.
“People spent so much time coming up with a list of things on that parks and rec priorities,” said councilwoman Donna Bell. “This was not a priority. This was not listed as one of the things where we’re like ‘let’s put some money away for the American Legion project’ because there were other things that were priorities.”
While no decision was made Wednesday night, the council will continue to discuss possibilities.
Representatives from Woodfield were in attendance, but did not address the council during the meeting.
Scott Underwood, who ran a community forum about the possible development in January, said they would be meeting with council members to help figure out the best way to move forward.http://chapelboro.com/featured/town-council-continues-to-review-american-legion-possibilities
Now that the economy has improved, there are several big developments before Chapel Hill and Carrboro governments. And there are the usual protesters saying don’t build it. Or at least don’t build it so all those lovely vistas that I enjoyed, but belong to other people, will be replaced by developments that I don’t want to live next door to.
I spoke to a neighbor to see what her taxes were like. “Oh, they are way too high. I can barely afford them anymore.”
When I pointed out that it is because there is little commercial base to relieve the burden on individual homeowners, she hadn’t thought of that.
I am asking everyone to think of that.
What is amazing to me is the number of people who don’t live anywhere near proposed developments. I was pleased that the Villages, Obey Creek, and Edge developments because there are few homes close by and they are on major thoroughfares. But, no the usual protests were raised even though they live nowhere near them.
I used to buy my underwear and lots of other things at Belk and Dillard’s in Chapel Hill. So, I shopped at Belk in Southpoint. There were traffic jams and no parking spaces and guess who else was there shopping?
Lots of people from Chapel Hill and Carrboro.
And guess whose library, police, and parks got the taxes from all of those Orange County shoppers?
So, the next time you go before the council and ask for extra funds for our libraries, swimming pools, and all those other amenities you enjoy, remember where you left your tax dollars that would have paid for all of that.
— Ellie Kinnairdhttp://chapelboro.com/columns/the-commentators/think-about-why-your-tax-dollars-are-so-high