A divided Supreme Court stopped Louisiana from enforcing new regulations on abortion clinics in a test of the conservative court’s views on abortion rights.
The justices said by a 5-4 vote late Thursday that they will not allow the state to put into effect a law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.
Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four liberals in putting a hold on the law, pending a full review of the case.
President Donald Trump’s two Supreme Court appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, were among the four conservative members of the court who would have allowed the law to take effect.
Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion in which he said the court’s action was premature because the state had made clear it would allow abortion providers an additional 45 days to obtain admitting privileges before it started enforcing the law.
If the doctors succeed, they can continue performing abortions, he said. If they fail, they could return to court, Kavanaugh said.
The law is very similar to a Texas measure the justices struck down three years ago. Roberts dissented in that case.
But the composition of the court has changed since then, with Kavanaugh replacing Justice Anthony Kennedy, who voted to strike down the Texas law. Trump had pledged during the campaign to appoint “pro-life” justices, and abortion opponents are hoping the more conservative bench will be more open to upholding abortion restrictions.
Louisiana abortion providers and a district judge who initially heard the case said one or maybe two of the state’s three abortion clinics would have to close under the new law. There would be at most two doctors who could meet its requirements, they said.
But the federal appeals court in New Orleans rejected those claims, doubting that any clinics would have to close and saying the doctors had not tried hard enough to establish relationships with local hospitals.
In January, the full appeals court voted 9-6 not to get involved in the case, setting up the Supreme Court appeal.
The law had been scheduled to take effect Monday, but Justice Samuel Alito delayed the effective date at least through Thursday to give the justices more time. He and Justice Clarence Thomas were the other dissenters Thursday.
The justices could decide this spring whether to add the case to their calendar for the term that begins in October.
The case is June Medical Services v. Gee.
Related Stories
‹

Top Stories of 2022: Supreme Court Abortion Ruling Sparks Concern, Fear and BacklashThe Supreme Court's decision striking down Roe v. Wade was a defining moment of 2022 - and so was the local defense of abortion rights.

'Unprecedented' But Unsurprising: UNC Law Prof on the Supreme CourtUNC law professor Michael Gerhardt discusses how to understand (and maybe reform) the Supreme Court after last month's abortion ruling.

'You're Not Alone': Compass Center Reaches Out to Domestic Violence Victims After Supreme Court RulingThe Supreme Court's abortion decision has raised concern for domestic violence victims, but the Compass Center is reaching out locally.
![]()
Justices Won't Revive Alabama Ban on Abortion ProcedureThe Supreme Court won’t revive Alabama’s ban on the most commonly used procedure in second-trimester abortions. The measure has been blocked by lower courts. The justices on Friday rejected the state’s appeal in which it sought to enforce a law enacted in 2016 that bans the abortion procedure known as dilation and evacuation. Alabama Attorney […]
![]()
Supreme Court Signals more Openness to State Abortion RulesThe Supreme Court signaled Tuesday it is more open to state restrictions on abortion, upholding an Indiana law supported by abortion opponents that regulates the disposal of fetal remains. At the same time, the justices declined to take on an issue closer to the core of abortion rights, rejecting the state’s appeal of a lower […]

Supreme Court Restores Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone Through Telehealth, Mail and PharmaciesThe Supreme Court restored broad access to the abortion pill mifepristone, blocking a lower-court ruling. More challenges will come, though.

Chances Dwindling for Renewal of Health Care Subsidies, Risking Premium Spikes for MillionsHopes for an extension of health care subsidies were diminishing in Congress this week as lawmakers largely abandoned the issue.

North Carolina Governor Rolls Out Further Abortion Protections Ahead of Next Trump TermNorth Carolina Gov. Josh Stein unveiled measures extending protections for certain providers and patients' reproductive health data.

New 2025 Laws Hit Hot Topics From AI in Movies To Rapid-Fire GunsMany of the laws launching in January are a result of legislation passed this year. Others stem from ballot measures approved by voters.

Donald Trump Has Sweeping Plans for a Second Administration. Here’s What He’s ProposedDonald Trump has proposed sweeping changes in a second administration, including scaling back civil rights and expanding presidential powers.
›