RALEIGH – One North Carolina abortion clinic is now closed for good and another abortion center has re-opened after both were cited for problems that led to the suspension of services at each location this summer.
The N.C. Department of Health and Human Service confirmed Monday the physician at The Baker Clinic for Women in Durham voluntarily surrendered his license effective last week. The clinic already had closed its doors in early July after inspectors said the clinic failed to perform quality control testing on patients who received certain blood testing.
The Asheville surgery center FEMCARE opened its doors again late last week after regulators say certain deficiencies are no longer present. HHS said last month inspectors discovered problems there that were a threat to the health and safety of patients.http://chapelboro.com/news/health/one-nc-abortion-clinic-closed-another-reopens/
GREENSBORO – A federal judge wants to hear from lawyers in person on the legality of 2011 ultrasound requirements passed by North Carolina legislators before deciding whether they should be tossed out permanently as unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles already put the restrictions on hold nearly two years ago while the litigation took its course. She scheduled oral arguments for Friday in Greensboro on competing motions to strike down or uphold challenged portions of the law.
Abortion providers and abortion-rights groups sued over the ultrasound directives. They demand an abortion provider place an ultrasound image next to a pregnant woman so she can view it, describe image features and offer the woman the chance to listen to the heartbeat.
The Republican-led General Assembly passed more abortion law changes last month.http://chapelboro.com/news/health/2011-nc-abortion-law-challenges-before-judge-again/
NEW YORK – Our state continues to make the rounds on late night talk shows, with The Daily Show taking a few jeers at the North Carolina General Assembly this week.
John Oliver, the show’s temporary host while Jon Stewart is away for the summer, starts the show talking about voter reform bills across the country before settling on North Carolina and listing the list of changes our voter I.D. bill creates.
“And it doesn’t stop there,” Oliver says. “It also places all voting booths on buoys that are only accessible by yacht.”
Oliver played a clip of state senate majority leader Phil Berger responding to criticism that references only one example of in-person voter fraud has been found in the state.
“You could have gotten the same result by just passing a bill that said, ‘Dave can’t vote; he knows why,’” Oliver says.
From there, Oliver poked fun at more of North Carolina’s recent bills, especially the new abortion regulation bill that was initially added to a House bill banning Sharia law.
“Let me just understand this: you’re adding abortion restrictions to legislation banning the making of laws based upon religious belief?” Oliver says. “That’s like passing a bill banning high fructose corn syrup and adding a provision naming the state animal the gummy bear.”
He also looked at the final abortion bill that passed the Senate, which was added onto another unrelated bill. Although, as Oliver points out, perhaps they were more related than we thought.
“Is it that both of them involve guys in leather jackets your parents didn’t want you to date?” Oliver says.
At the end of his jokes at the General Assembly expense, Oliver had one important message, although it wasn’t for us.
“After a North Carolina legislative session like this, I think the big takeaway might be: your move, South Carolina,” Oliver says.
If you would like to tell John Oliver what you think about his jokes, he will be performing at the DPAC on November 9.http://chapelboro.com/news/state-government/nc-subject-of-jokes-on-the-daily-show/
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) – An Asheville abortion clinic has had its license suspended by the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services over what the agency calls violations of existing rules.
A statement issued Wednesday said the violations discovered by inspectors revealed a threat to the health and safety of patients.
DHHS director of health service regulation Drexdal Pratt said inspectors found FEMCARE Inc., failed to comply with 23 separate rules. Among the violations, the agency said FEMCARE failed to maintain anesthesia delivery systems in good working condition, with torn masks and tubing held together with tape.
FEMCARE officials couldn’t be reached for comment Wednesday.
The suspension comes two days after Governor Pat McCrory signed into law legislation that would let DHHS require that abortion clinics meet the standards of an outpatient surgical center.http://chapelboro.com/news/health/nc-agency-suspends-license-of-abortion-clinic/
RALEIGH, NC – North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory has signed into law tougher regulations on abortion clinics that supporters say will enhance safety and opponents contend will force most to close.
McCrory said Monday the law he signed doesn’t limit access to abortion clinics.
The law directs the Republican governor’s Department of Health and Human Services to regulate abortion clinics using the same standards as those for outpatient surgical centers.
Opponents say that would effectively close most of the state’s 16 abortion clinics since only one now meets those standards. A state regulatory official says an ambulatory surgical center costs about $1 million more to build than an abortion clinic and it’s unclear how much it would cost existing clinics to convert to higher standards.http://chapelboro.com/news/state-government/mccrory-signs-nc-abortion-legislation-into-law/
RALEIGH- Governor Pat McCrory says he will sign into law the controversial abortion bill passed by the House earlier this week. McCrory had previously said he would veto the Senate’s version of the bill, which called for abortion clinics to be regulated as ambulatory surgical centers. It also mandated that a doctor be present for all stages of an abortion procedure.
The House version of the bill is slightly less stringent. It calls for the Department of Health and Human Services to develop new regulations that do not limit access to abortion services. In a statement released on Friday, McCrory called the House version “an improved bill which will better protect women while not further limiting access.”
McCrory has drawn fire in recent weeks as critics say he has abandoned a campaign promise to not support any measure that would restrict abortions.
However, the governor’s approval might not matter much in the long run, as Republicans in the House and Senate have large enough majorities to override any veto.http://chapelboro.com/news/state-government/mccrory-says-hell-sign-new-abortion-bill/
RALEIGH – Protesters gathered at the state’s legislature Wednesday morning to demonstrate against a bill passed by the state Senate that tightens the regulations on abortion clinics before the Senate went on break .
House Bill 695 passed by a vote of 29-12 and will return to the House for a final vote after it returns from the July 4 break.
Chapel Hill town council member, Laurin Easthom, says she is disappointed by the bill’s passage and is upset by legislators who say the bill was passed to protect women’s health.
“I think that is just as shifty and as disingenuous as how this bill got passed in the first place,” Easthom says.
***Listen to the Full Interview***
The restrictions were added to a bill intended to outlaw Sharia law in North Carolina. Sharia law refers to laws interpreted or passed down in an Islamic court or imposed under a caliphate. After the amendment was made, the bill was passed in the Senate in less than 24 hours.
The regulations require all abortion clinics to meet the same standards as ambulatory emergency clinics, which all but one of the state’s clinics cannot meet. In addition, federal, county and city health coverage plans would no longer cover abortion, except in the case of rape or incest or to save the life of the pregnant woman, and health care providers are given the choice of not providing abortion-related services.
“It’s really got implications for women hugely across the state that no one realizes,” Easthom says. “I can’t believe that this has gotten to the point that it has.”
Easthom believes this bill does not reflect the views of many in the state.
“There’s quite the disconnect between what’s happening in the General Assembly and how voters feel about things,” Easthom says.
Easthom adds that the difference is not only with abortion, but with all of the issues brought up in the recent Moral Mondays protests.
“This was almost like the last straw for me,” Easthom says. “I think this is horrific.”
Governor Pat McCrory spoke out against the Senate’s method of passing the bill, comparing it to how the Democratic Senate passed bills in the previous term.http://chapelboro.com/news/state-government/chapel-hill-town-council-members-speaks-out-against-abortion-restrictions/
CHAPEL HILL – Democratic State Senator Ellie Kinnaird of Chapel Hill and Carrboro was one of just 12 North Carolina Senators who cast a ‘no’ vote Wednesday on House Bill 695, which would severely restrict abortion in the state of North Carolina.
***Listen to the Interview***
The bill has sparked intense controversy across the state–not only because of its content, but also for the way it was passed: HB 695 began as a ban on the enforcement of Sharia law, but state senators amended it at the last minute (and largely out of the public eye) to include significant restrictions on abortion.
“They rammed this bill through the judiciary committee,” Sen. Kinnaird said after HB 695 passed the Senate on Wednesday. “They had not told the general public and they had not told any (abortion rights) advocates, so this was really a breach in public trust.” (Sen. Kinnaird says even she was not informed about the changes to the bill until 7:00 on Tuesday evening; the final vote was cast on Wednesday morning.)
Despite the short time frame, hundreds of North Carolinians turned out at the General Assembly Wednesday morning to demonstrate, both against the bill itself and against the way it was passed.
“I stirred them up a little bit,” says Kinnaird (who’d spoken passionately against the bill on Tuesday night). “When I first walked in and saw them, I clapped to them–and of course they just burst out in clapping.” Lt. Governor Dan Forest repeatedly silenced the crowd–one protestor was even removed from the building–but Kinnaird says “even their silent presence was very powerful.”
As amended, HB 695 includes a variety of provisions. Perhaps most notably, it would require abortion providers to meet the same standards as ambulatory surgery centers, a move abortion-rights advocates say is designed to shut down providers. Only one clinic in the entire state currently meets those standards; all others would effectively have to close–and Kinnaird says the standards governing ambulatory centers are irrelevant when it comes to clinics that provide abortions.
“(The standards govern) the linoleum on the floor and the paint on the walls,” she says, “as well as equipment–(requiring) things that would be there in an ambulatory (center) that just aren’t necessary in an abortion clinic.”
Moreover, Kinnaird says, those ‘abortion clinics’ don’t only provide abortions. “Women, low-income women, use this as their primary health care,” she says. “They get family planning materials there, they also get cancer screening–if we close these down, these folks without insurance, low-income people, are going to really suffer (in terms of) general health care.”
Another provision of the bill would prevent city and county health plans from covering abortions as well, unless it is to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest.
As always with abortion debates, Kinnaird says the discussion of HB 695 got very heated: “At the end,” she says, “one of the backers of the bill told one of our Democrats that she was going to hell and he was praying for her.” But in this case, passions flared not only because of the content of the bill, but because of the process by which it was pushed through–an issue with a long history of its own.
“At one point (in the debate), the Rules chair stood up and said, ‘Well, you Democrats did it (like this) a long time,’” Kinnaird says. Republican Governor Pat McCrory made a similar comment in a statement denouncing the procedure: “It was not right then,” he said Wednesday, “and it is not right now.” (Kinnaird too doesn’t deny that Democrats could have been more transparent when they were the majority party–but adds, “Just because somebody (else) did it doesn’t make it right.”)
House Bill 695 passed the Senate by a vote of 29-12. The amended bill still needs to be approved by the State House, but its passage seems all but certain: Governor McCrory pledged during last year’s campaign not to sign any bill that imposes further restrictions on abortion, but Republicans have a veto-proof majority in both houses even if McCrory follows through on that pledge. Indeed, notwithstanding the procedural controversy, Kinnaird concedes that the bill would likely have passed the Senate in its current form even if GOP leaders had allowed ample time for public debate.
Even if it passes the legislature, though, Kinnaird says the story will be far from over. “The Attorney General said this bill is likely to generate a lot of Constitutional issues in the courts,” she says, “so even if it passes, it’ll be in the courts for a long time.”
And while Democrats have little power to shape the discourse in Raleigh now, Kinnaird says she’s confident that this debate will contribute to an anti-GOP backlash in 2014.
“People are finally beginning to realize (that) this is an extreme group, and we know that the people of North Carolina do not want extremism,” she says. “They don’t want to be on the Jon Stewart show (or) Rachel Maddow as laughingstocks of the country…
“We used to be a beacon of light (and) a beacon of enlightenment in the South, and we are no longer that–and I know that the people of North Carolina believe that we should be that beacon of light, that beacon of enlightenment. And they’re going to, I think, really react at the polls.”http://chapelboro.com/news/state-government/kinnaird-on-abortion-bill-breach-in-public-trust/
DURHAM – The state House voted Thursday to pass a bill that would make it part of state sex education classes to inform students of the causes of premature birth. Along with drug use and alcohol, the bill includes abortion as one of the causes, based on a study by the state Child Fatality Task Force.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Health Association, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization do not recognize the science behind a link between abortion resulting in future premature births.
In a pamphlet on abortion, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says that, “most experts agree that one abortion does not affect future pregnancies.”
Director of public affairs for Planned Parenthood of Central North Carolina, Alison Kiser, says that this bill will make it less likely for students to receive necessary sex education information.
“This bill forces teachers to lie to teenagers and does nothing to provide them with the medically accurate information that they need to make healthy, lifelong decisions,” Kiser says.
The bill, Senate Bill 132, is an extension of the Healthy Youth Act of 2009, a law that lays out sex education in North Carolina schools.
Among the items required are that classes must teach, “the positive benefits of abstinence until marriage and the risks of premarital sexual activity.”
Director of strategic communications for the Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Campaign of North Carolina, Elizabeth Finley, says that sex education that focuses on abstinence until marriage is not only ineffective, but it leaves students worse off than students who receive no sex education in school.
“They’re less likely to use condoms, they’re more likely to engage in relationships that have some risky characteristics,” Finley says. “For example, relationships where there’s a greater age disparity between partners.”
The Healthy Youth Act does include guidelines for teaching FDA-approved birth control methods, which would still be in effect, even in SB132 becomes law. However, Finley says that these birth control methods are not taught at all of the required schools.
“There are some school districts across the state that have pushed back at implementing the Healthy Youth Act,” Finley says. “So we know that in many school systems, that information, although it’s required by law, doesn’t actually get to students.”
The Healthy Youth Act also says that sex education curricula must include that “a mutually faithful monogamous heterosexual relationship in the context of marriage is the best lifelong means of avoiding sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS,” which Kiser describes as bad advice for students.
“You certainly can’t expect that later on, as adults, teenagers will grow up to only have heterosexual relationships if, in fact, they are not heterosexual,” Kiser says.
In North Carolina schools, instruction on sexually transmitted infections and contraception is optional for students, but the provision in SB132 that students be taught that abortion is a potential cause of premature birth is required for all.http://chapelboro.com/news/state-government/state-house-passes-abortion-education-bill/
CHAPEL HILL- The Chapel Hill Town Council is publically advocating for an end to what some are calling deceptive practices in North Carolina’s crisis pregnancy centers.
The resolution was written by NARAL North Carolina, an organization that advocates for pro-choice rights throughout the state. Here’s NARAL Executive Director Suzanne Buckley, who spoke during last week’s meeting.
“We believe it’s time to stop deceiving and misleading women, and start empowering women to make reproductive health care decisions that are right for them and for their families,” she says. “And that’s what this resolution will do.”
Buckley says that the NARAL organization decided to take action after its 2011 report exposed deceptive tactics in North Carolina’s estimated 122 crisis pregnancy centers.
“Fifty-nine percent incorrectly exaggerated abortion risks, 56 percent made claims about a so-called ‘post-abortion stress syndrome,’ which isn’t recognized by the DSM V, and 26 percent incorrectly linked abortion to breast cancer, which has been refuted by multiple studies.”
And Katie Mannis, who has also read NARAL’s report, says those statistics are shocking and require immediate action.
“Young women are often unaware of CPCs’ agendas,” she says. They might visit a CPC in need of help, only to be faced with manipuilation and false information…They are being lied to [and] we are being lied to.”
But not everyone is dissatisfied with the job that local crisis pregnancy centers are doing; Mimi Every, who serves as executive director of Chapel Hill’s Pregnancy Support Services Center, says her organization has never provided its clients with misleading information
“I fully agree that women should never be manipulated, coerced, or given misinformation,” she says. “That wouldn’t be right or fair, but we don’t do that.”
Although the council’s resolution encourages the General Assembly to take action against potentially misleading information, Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt says council members can’t directly control the practices of any crisis pregnancy centers.
“I want to make it clear that the town isn’t in the position to tell any organization in this arena what they can and can’t do,” he says. “Any concern that we let things happen is inaccurate, because it’s not in our authority. This resolution calls upon another authority to take action.http://chapelboro.com/news/chtc-passes-resolution-discouraging-deceptive-information-from-cpcs/